26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

theory-testing samples, but are not representative <strong>of</strong> the countries. Using samples such<br />

as these Schwartz developed his theoretical arrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>value</strong> dimensions.<br />

Figure 3.3. China <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Samples Available in Schwartz’ Database<br />

ID<br />

China N<br />

Year<br />

Collected<br />

1101 Teachers-Shanghai, T_SH 208 1988<br />

1102 Teachers-Guangzhou, T_GZ 193 1989<br />

1103 Teachers-Hebei , T_HeB 188 1989<br />

1205 Students-Shanghai, S_SH 205 1988<br />

2205 Students-Shanghai VALUES CHANGE TEST, S_SH_95 212 1995<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong> N<br />

107<br />

Year<br />

Collected<br />

1101 Teachers-South Isl<strong>and</strong>, T_SoIs 199 1988<br />

1205 Students-Christchurch, T_ChCh 202 1988<br />

1409 General-Auckl<strong>and</strong>, G_Akl 139 1998<br />

1606 Students (Education)-Auckl<strong>and</strong>, S_Akl 289 1994<br />

Liden <strong>and</strong> Antonakis (2009) remind us that the physical <strong>and</strong> social environment in<br />

which leadership is observed (the context) varies; <strong>and</strong> the contexts need to be<br />

measurable, <strong>and</strong> must be modelled when attempting to explain a particular aspect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

leadership puzzle. An important criterion that Dubin (1976) identified for theory<br />

building was the boundary conditions (i.e. the context, including space <strong>and</strong> time) under<br />

which a theory is expected to hold; the theoretical dimensions should not be affected by<br />

culture <strong>and</strong> time. As such, scholars must consider context in leadership research, such as<br />

by examining the way context influences the variability that may emerge in the<br />

constructs under study or by assessing how context can moderate relations between<br />

variables.<br />

Past studies indicate an effect from organisational work-related demographics, so we<br />

can expect an effect from being in business vs. teaching or being a student, as we shall<br />

see below. Personal communication with Shalom Schwartz (2006) indicates that<br />

contingency variables such as job/industry type influence the relative salience <strong>of</strong> <strong>value</strong><br />

dimensions. Schwartz <strong>and</strong> Sagiv (1995) found country <strong>and</strong> type <strong>of</strong> sample to affect<br />

<strong>value</strong> structures. Schwartz’s database provides several samples from China <strong>and</strong> New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>. In addition to the review <strong>of</strong> past studies in China above I will use Schwartz’<br />

public database for within country comparisons. In China I will first compare the<br />

tertiary student <strong>and</strong> secondary teacher samples from Hebei, Shanghai, <strong>and</strong> Guangzhou.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!