26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

develop. The organisation is then more likely to encourage members to generate<br />

independent <strong>and</strong> unique ideas, be innovative in designing their tasks, <strong>and</strong> perhaps even<br />

to pursue their own agendas to some extent.<br />

Not all members have equal influence upon the cultural <strong>value</strong>s <strong>of</strong> their organisation. The<br />

founder typically has significant, long-term influence on an organisation’s cultural<br />

<strong>value</strong>s (Gordon, 1991; Schein, 1983; Schneider, 1987; Schneider, Goldstein <strong>and</strong> Smith,<br />

1995). Members’ influence derives from a combination <strong>of</strong> status, seniority, experience<br />

<strong>and</strong>, <strong>of</strong>ten, charisma. Founders bring their own <strong>value</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> their personal actions <strong>and</strong><br />

decisions <strong>and</strong> the organisational practices <strong>and</strong> systems they put in place affect the<br />

emerging cultural <strong>value</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the organisation.<br />

Other factors affect the likelihood that individual members will influence the <strong>value</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

the organisation’s members. Organisational factors include, for example, the size <strong>and</strong><br />

age <strong>of</strong> the organisation. The smaller <strong>and</strong> the younger an organisation, the more<br />

influence individuals are likely to have. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, individuals who join mature<br />

organisations encounter long-established norms <strong>and</strong> practices that are resistant to<br />

change. Values, norms <strong>and</strong> practices in younger organisations are likely to be evolving<br />

<strong>and</strong> hence be more susceptible to the influence <strong>of</strong> the <strong>value</strong>s <strong>of</strong> their members. Also<br />

important is the strength <strong>of</strong> organisational culture, that is, the degree <strong>of</strong> consensus<br />

regarding the <strong>value</strong>s, norms, <strong>and</strong> practices central to the organisation (Schein, 1992).<br />

For another academic research truism, the stronger the organisational culture, the less<br />

individuals can influence it (Chatman, 1989; Thompson, Stradling, Murphy <strong>and</strong><br />

O’Neill, 1996).<br />

Personal factors that affect individuals’ abilities to influence organisational <strong>value</strong>s<br />

include an individual’s status, experience, <strong>and</strong> seniority (Gordon, 1991; Schein, 1992).<br />

Leadership positions enable individuals to communicate or even impose their views <strong>of</strong><br />

what ought to be (e.g., dress codes, reward systems, <strong>of</strong>fice allocation <strong>and</strong> promotion<br />

protocols). With experience <strong>and</strong> length <strong>of</strong> service, organisation members can gain<br />

knowledge about prevailing organisational <strong>value</strong>s, <strong>of</strong> the vested interests these <strong>value</strong>s<br />

serve, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the constraints against changing them. This may enable the ability to<br />

influence organisational culture.<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> Schwartz’ Theory <strong>of</strong> Individual <strong>and</strong> Cultural Value Dimensions<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!