26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING SMALLEST SPACE ANALYSIS<br />

Schwartz’ theoretical cultural <strong>value</strong> dimensions were based on visual inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spatial plots from Multidimensional Scaling Smallest Space Analysis, guided by a priori<br />

criteria, primarily from Rokeach’s dimensions (Schwartz, 1992; Schwartz <strong>and</strong> Sagiv,<br />

1995). Schwartz selected items <strong>and</strong> dimensions that, in the large majority <strong>of</strong> samples,<br />

the items that operationalise each <strong>value</strong> occupied a distinct region in the space, with no<br />

substantial empty spaces between regions. I will test the hypothesis,<br />

Hypothesis: SVS Value Structure: The Multidimensional Scaling<br />

Smallest Space Analysis <strong>value</strong> structures for the SVS <strong>and</strong> LBDQXII<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Guangzhou City sample data will not differ from<br />

Schwartz’ theoretical model.<br />

Cohen (2000), using Smallest Space Analysis, derives “facets” <strong>of</strong> items defining <strong>value</strong><br />

dimensions around a “core <strong>value</strong>” dimension. SSA analysis <strong>of</strong> various sets <strong>of</strong> SVS data,<br />

from Guangzhou for example, <strong>and</strong> also from Oman (Ibrahim Alkindi, post-graduate<br />

student, Griffith University, 2008, personal communication) indicate that the core <strong>and</strong><br />

peripheral <strong>value</strong> structure may fit better than a circumplex in some countries with<br />

societal cultures similar to China <strong>and</strong> Oman. Additional analyses need to be carried out<br />

to investigate this possibility. Figure 5.12 can be interpreted as a <strong>value</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> a<br />

core <strong>of</strong> Confucian Values: Benevolence, Universalism, Self-Direction, Achievement,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Maintaining Face, with Power, Hedonism, <strong>and</strong> Tradition as peripheral <strong>value</strong>s. As<br />

noted above, the operationalisation <strong>of</strong> Tradition in the SVS items is problematic. As<br />

noted in Chapter 3, Spini (2003), for twenty-one national samples, found Hedonism to<br />

not have metric equivalence across nations <strong>and</strong> configural equivalence was impossible<br />

to evaluate due to too few items in the scale. For further inspection <strong>of</strong> validity, I now<br />

inspect the SSA for the two samples in this study.<br />

Smallest Space Analysis for the SVS Sample Data<br />

The SSA plots in the figures below depict diagrams replicating Schwartz’ statistical<br />

technique, comparing actual to theoretical relative placements <strong>of</strong> the dimensions in 2dimensional<br />

space.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!