26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

as undesirable. These kinds <strong>of</strong> commentary indicate that in non-Western societies such<br />

as China there are still questions arising as to validity <strong>of</strong> the SVS item construction<br />

using the abstract <strong>value</strong> (qualification) structure, <strong>and</strong> the reliability <strong>of</strong> item-todimension<br />

correlations that require further investigation.<br />

Conclusions Concerning the SVS<br />

Given the sample sizes for this study, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn<br />

concerning the general reliability <strong>of</strong> the SVS in the two cultures. Whilst the alpha for<br />

Hedonism in China is quite low; this set <strong>of</strong> items will be used until further research can<br />

investigate the usefulness <strong>of</strong> these three items to define the Hedonism dimension in<br />

China <strong>and</strong> other cultures. Other reliability study results indicate the SVS is an<br />

acceptably reliable instrument to investigate differences between my samples. All items<br />

are maintained in the analyses to provide comparability with past studies using the SVS,<br />

the answer to the question “Are there appropriate measuring instruments to assess<br />

dimensions <strong>and</strong> structures?” for the SVS is yes, the instrument is adequate.<br />

SAMPLING ISSUES<br />

The bulk <strong>of</strong> cross-cultural research consists <strong>of</strong> cross-cultural comparisons that<br />

investigate the existence <strong>of</strong> differences across cultural groups. Methodologically, such<br />

studies are field studies, quasi-experimental studies in which cultural group is the<br />

independent variable <strong>and</strong> individual, usually psychological, variables are dependent<br />

variables. Most <strong>of</strong>ten the sample cultural groups are national groups (i.e., from single<br />

countries), although ethnic, language, <strong>and</strong> racial groupings are also studied. When the<br />

basic independent variable in cross-cultural research is country or nation <strong>of</strong> residence <strong>of</strong><br />

participants, problems can then arise when scholars view this one variable as a<br />

superordinate package <strong>of</strong> other dimensions <strong>and</strong> interpret this variable as not only<br />

descriptive but also explanatory (Whiting 1976).<br />

The Nation-State as a Useful Variable in Cross-Cultural Behavioural Research<br />

Smith (2004b) believes the sheer convenience <strong>of</strong> currently available nation-based<br />

databanks from major projects force many researchers into simplification <strong>of</strong> culture by<br />

defining it as national culture. Smith believes that in future studies it is important to use<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!