26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LBDQXII<br />

correlations with<br />

Charisma/Extra<br />

Effort<br />

Persuasiveness<br />

correlated 0.55, F4:<br />

Persuasiveness<br />

measures to what<br />

extent the manager<br />

uses oral<br />

persuasion <strong>and</strong><br />

argument<br />

effectively.<br />

Predictive<br />

Accuracy<br />

correlated 0.58,<br />

F10: Predictive<br />

Accuracy measures<br />

to what extent the<br />

manager exhibits<br />

foresight <strong>and</strong><br />

ability to predict<br />

outcomes<br />

accurately.<br />

Tolerance <strong>of</strong><br />

Freedom<br />

correlated 0.54, F6:<br />

Tolerance <strong>of</strong><br />

Freedom reflects to<br />

what extent the<br />

manager allows<br />

followers scope for<br />

initiative, decision<br />

<strong>and</strong> action.<br />

GLOBE 2 nd<br />

order leadership<br />

scales based on<br />

the 1 st order scale<br />

to the right<br />

-Charismatic /<br />

Value Based<br />

-Team-Oriented<br />

Charismatic /<br />

Value Based<br />

Participative<br />

GLOBE: 1 st<br />

order leadership<br />

scales<br />

-Inspirational<br />

-Diplomatic<br />

Visionary<br />

-Autocratic<br />

(reverse-scored)<br />

-Nonparticipative<br />

(reverse-scored)<br />

301<br />

Example key items in<br />

GLOBE survey<br />

-Enthusiastic, positive,<br />

encouraging, motivational,<br />

morale booster<br />

-Diplomatic, win/win<br />

problem-solver, effective<br />

bargainer<br />

Future-oriented,<br />

anticipatory, visionary,<br />

intellectually stimulating<br />

-Autocratic, dictatorial,<br />

elitist, ruler, domineering<br />

-Non-delegator, micromanager,<br />

non-egalitarian,<br />

individually-oriented<br />

Results in<br />

This Study:<br />

Relatively<br />

highly<br />

preferred<br />

by both<br />

samples,<br />

higher for<br />

NZ sample<br />

Middle<br />

range<br />

preference<br />

by samples<br />

Not highly<br />

ranked by<br />

either<br />

sample,<br />

low for GZ<br />

sample <strong>and</strong><br />

mid-range<br />

for NZ<br />

sample

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!