26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

determine how work <strong>value</strong>s are perceived in those nations by the prevailing cultural<br />

<strong>value</strong> emphases. An emphasis on extrinsic work <strong>value</strong>s is hypothesised to be compatible<br />

with Embeddedness <strong>and</strong> Hierarchy culture <strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> to conflict with Intellectual<br />

Autonomy <strong>value</strong>s. The location <strong>of</strong> the samples indicate that both the Chinese teacher<br />

<strong>and</strong> student samples gave relatively strong emphasis to Embeddedness <strong>and</strong> Hierarchy<br />

<strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> weak emphasis to Intellectual Autonomy <strong>value</strong>s, whereas the New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

samples showed the opposite cultural <strong>value</strong> emphases. If cultural <strong>value</strong>s are associated<br />

with <strong>and</strong> influence individual work <strong>value</strong>s, then the pursuit <strong>of</strong> extrinsic work <strong>value</strong>s is<br />

more common, <strong>and</strong> their use as motivators probably more effective, e.g., in China than<br />

in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.<br />

SUMMARY: CULTURE<br />

How many cultural <strong>value</strong> dimensions are needed to capture the broad cultural <strong>value</strong><br />

differences amongst societies? Schwartz (2004) believes that it is too early in our<br />

development <strong>of</strong> knowledge to answer this question definitively, but he believes as few<br />

as three or four bi-polar dimensions, each comprising a pair <strong>of</strong> nearly opposing<br />

orientations, may suffice.<br />

Schwartz (2004, amongst other works) believes the critical <strong>value</strong> dimensions are<br />

unlikely to be orthogonal. They evolve as preferences for resolving basic issues in<br />

managing life in society. It is not logical that preferences for resolving one issue will not<br />

become intertwined with preferences for resolving other issues. Cultures that encourage<br />

Autonomy in individual/group relations are unlikely to prefer hierarchy for managing<br />

human interdependence in business organisations. Though not opposites, Autonomy <strong>and</strong><br />

hierarchy rarely appear together because they indicate conflicting views <strong>of</strong> human<br />

nature. Schwartz believes deriving orthogonal dimensions from data can lead to results<br />

that ignore tendencies toward consistency <strong>and</strong> coherence across <strong>value</strong>s in national<br />

cultures.<br />

Analyses <strong>of</strong> empirical <strong>and</strong> conceptual relations amongst the various cultural <strong>value</strong><br />

dimensions <strong>and</strong> orientations suggest that it is useful to discriminate at least the<br />

following:<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!