26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4: METHODS AND METHODOLOGY<br />

As far as the laws <strong>of</strong> mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain <strong>and</strong> as far as they<br />

are certain, they do not refer to reality.<br />

-- Albert Einstein<br />

In the study <strong>of</strong> the relationships between individual <strong>value</strong>s as predictors <strong>of</strong> leader<br />

behaviour preferences different between samples <strong>of</strong> businesspeople from Guangzhou<br />

City, China, <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, I find the details <strong>of</strong> methods are especially important<br />

concerns; hence I will discuss them early, as the third chapter. The concerns are due to<br />

the difficulty in making <strong>comparative</strong> analyses, e.g. between samples from societies<br />

speaking different languages, particularly for reliability <strong>and</strong> validity estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

research instruments. Discussion <strong>of</strong> these issues at this point in the thesis is important to<br />

set the stage for discussion <strong>of</strong> past research <strong>and</strong> to qualify findings in the literature<br />

review chapter.<br />

METHODS<br />

I provide reasons <strong>and</strong> support for the choices <strong>of</strong> methods following a well-established<br />

methods tradition in major cross-cultural social science research projects, those carried<br />

out under the direction <strong>of</strong> Inglehart (1977), H<strong>of</strong>stede (1980), Schwartz (1992),<br />

Trompenaars (1993), <strong>and</strong> the Global Leadership <strong>and</strong> Organisational Behaviour<br />

Effectiveness (GLOBE) project (House et al., 2004), I selected a positivist approach<br />

based upon field study survey research as the method for my project. Field study refers<br />

to collecting data “in the wild” from people engaged in the behaviours we wish to study<br />

in the customary environment for the behaviours. Survey research is a quantitative<br />

method, requiring collecting st<strong>and</strong>ardised information from or about the subjects being<br />

studied. The purpose <strong>of</strong> a survey is to produce quantitative descriptions <strong>of</strong> some aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> a population <strong>of</strong> interest. Survey analysis can be concerned with relationships between<br />

variables, or with projecting findings descriptively to populations <strong>of</strong> interest. In survey<br />

research, the way <strong>of</strong> collecting data is by asking people predefined structured questions<br />

that refer to themselves or some other unit <strong>of</strong> analysis. The data is collected from a<br />

relatively small sample <strong>of</strong> the study population, in such a way as <strong>and</strong> large enough to be<br />

able to generalise the findings to the population. The sample size must be large enough<br />

to allow extensive statistical analysis. For lengthy discussions <strong>of</strong> the method see Babbie<br />

(1990), Lavrakas (1993), Weisberg, Krosnick <strong>and</strong> Bowen (1996), <strong>and</strong> Krosnick (1999).<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!