26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Von Krogh <strong>and</strong> Roos (1995) assert that positivistic research can be employed to<br />

produce meaningful quantitative measures, but the nature <strong>of</strong> culture makes its<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing through these research techniques difficult. The positivistic approach<br />

emphasizes the importance <strong>of</strong> generalizations <strong>and</strong> universal laws. Cross-cultural<br />

research based on this approach has established a large number <strong>of</strong> generalisations;<br />

however, many <strong>of</strong> these generalizations are neither very general nor exact. Inspection<br />

<strong>and</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> theories relating to culture need to seek those that provide us with<br />

clear, exact, <strong>and</strong> reliable results. By definition the findings <strong>of</strong> such studies should be<br />

viewed as highly embedded in social context <strong>of</strong> the research team <strong>and</strong> the society<br />

studied. When we apply the theory removed from their original context, the results must<br />

replicate in other cultures.<br />

OPERATIONALISATION AS ONTOLOGY<br />

Gruber (1993) focuses on systems for knowledge sharing <strong>and</strong> collective intelligence in<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> ontology engineering <strong>and</strong> defines ontology in the context <strong>of</strong> artificial<br />

intelligence. In information technology, an ontology system is the working model <strong>of</strong><br />

entities <strong>and</strong> interactions in some particular domain <strong>of</strong> knowledge or practices, such as<br />

electronic commerce or the activity <strong>of</strong> planning. Gruber says ontology is the<br />

specification <strong>of</strong> conceptualizations to help in sharing knowledge. In this usage, an<br />

ontology system is a set <strong>of</strong> concepts, such as things, events, <strong>and</strong> relations that are<br />

specified in some way, such as a specific natural language, in order to create an agreedupon<br />

vocabulary for exchanging information. At the stage <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

<strong>of</strong> culture <strong>and</strong> leadership, ontology must be directed to operational definitions. In study<br />

after study, e.g., my own research (Littrell, 2002; Schneider <strong>and</strong> Littrell, 2003; Littrell<br />

<strong>and</strong> Valentin, 2005; Littrell <strong>and</strong> Nkomo, 2005; <strong>and</strong> Littrell 2006a <strong>and</strong> 2006b), <strong>and</strong> the<br />

GLOBE study (Chhokar et al., 2007) <strong>and</strong> Schwartz’s theory <strong>of</strong> <strong>value</strong>s (1992 <strong>and</strong> 1994),<br />

I see items operationalising dimensions moving from dimension to dimension across<br />

cultures. Culture <strong>and</strong> leadership dimensions are <strong>of</strong> little <strong>value</strong> if the operationalisations<br />

are not consistent across cultures. Hence, until dimensions can be operationalised by<br />

measures that are invariant, focus on the items is important.<br />

Since culture is complex researchers adopting a positivistic analytical approach try to<br />

develop parsimonious models (e.g. H<strong>of</strong>stede, 1980) utilizing as few variables as<br />

possible for sufficient definition, with the variables being objective. Through<br />

operationalisations, they attempt to reduce complex concepts such as a sufficiently<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!