26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>value</strong> dimensions across countries, but few actually using the dimensions to draw<br />

conclusions about the relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>value</strong> <strong>priorities</strong> to behaviour in real life situations.<br />

From contacts from students seeking to obtain versions <strong>of</strong> the SVS I do see a growing<br />

number <strong>of</strong> Master’s <strong>and</strong> PhD theses applying the survey to business issues.<br />

I will describe Schwartz’ theory in detail. I provide overviews <strong>of</strong> societal culture in<br />

Guangzhou City <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, including results <strong>of</strong> past studies using the SVS<br />

where available. The behaviour theory <strong>of</strong> leadership is discussed, followed by the<br />

interrelationships <strong>of</strong> leadership <strong>and</strong> culture. A conceptual model <strong>of</strong> cross-cultural<br />

business relationships will be developed based on preferred managerial leader behaviour<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>value</strong> <strong>priorities</strong>, described below.<br />

National Character <strong>and</strong> National Culture<br />

Clark (1990) reviewed research <strong>of</strong> national character <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers the following definition,<br />

“national character describes the pattern <strong>of</strong> enduring personality characteristics found<br />

among the population <strong>of</strong> nations”. McCrae (2000, 2009) discusses personality, culture,<br />

<strong>and</strong> national character at length. Though mentioned <strong>and</strong> discussed occasionally, the<br />

national character approach to defining culture will not be investigated in this research<br />

project, as it represents an approach to measuring dimensions other than the one<br />

selected for the overarching research project established in 1997 (Littrell, 2002).<br />

Cultural Congruence, Leadership Behaviour, <strong>and</strong> Cultural Values<br />

Cultural congruence theory (House, Wright <strong>and</strong> Aditya, 1997) suggests that leader<br />

behaviours consistent with follower <strong>value</strong>s will be viewed as more acceptable <strong>and</strong> be<br />

more effective in eliciting follower response than those representing conflicting <strong>value</strong>s.<br />

House et al. (1997) argued that a violation <strong>of</strong> cultural norms by leaders could result in<br />

dissatisfaction on the part <strong>of</strong> followers, <strong>and</strong> at times lower performance. Leader<br />

behaviour preferences are functions <strong>of</strong> the interaction between <strong>value</strong>s, including cultural<br />

<strong>value</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> leader attributes <strong>and</strong> behaviours. Accordingly, leader attributes <strong>and</strong><br />

behaviours that are congruent with followers cultural <strong>value</strong>s will be more accepted than<br />

leader attributes <strong>and</strong> behaviours that are not congruent with them. In this study, I will<br />

assess which leader behaviour sets are congruent with which individual <strong>value</strong> sets for<br />

the two samples I have drawn from Guangzhou City, China, <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. I will<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!