26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

interrelationships <strong>of</strong> dimension means for the samples <strong>of</strong><br />

businesspeople for both New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Guangzhou City for<br />

the SVS <strong>and</strong> LBDQXII dimensions.<br />

THEORIES OF PERSONAL VALUES OF BUSINESSPEOPLE<br />

(c) Dilbert by Scott Adams, United Features Syndicate.<br />

There is a feedback system driving relationships amongst individual personality,<br />

individual <strong>value</strong>s in a culture, national <strong>and</strong>/or societal culture, <strong>and</strong> organisational<br />

culture. In social science theorising, scholars have debated the effect <strong>of</strong> national culture<br />

on management <strong>and</strong> organisational practices for decades. International management <strong>and</strong><br />

organisation literature propose the convergence hypothesis <strong>and</strong> the divergence<br />

hypothesis. The convergence hypothesis implies that as nations develop, they embrace<br />

work-related behaviour common to already industrialized countries (Ralston, Holt,<br />

Terpstra <strong>and</strong> Yu, 1997: 182), concluding that organisations in countries will become<br />

more alike <strong>and</strong> adopt universal practices about work <strong>and</strong> corporate culture as they<br />

industrialise (Shenkar <strong>and</strong> Ronen, 1987; Child <strong>and</strong> Keiser, 1979). Thus, organizations<br />

can alter the behaviour <strong>of</strong> people <strong>and</strong> overcome the effects <strong>of</strong> national culture (Von<br />

Glinow, Drost <strong>and</strong> Teagarden, 2002). The divergence hypothesis argues that ‘‘national<br />

culture, not industrialized practice, drives <strong>value</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> that, even if the country becomes<br />

industrialized, the <strong>value</strong>s systems in the work force remain will largely unchanged’’<br />

(Ralston et al., 1997: 183). Thus, ‘‘even if organizations located within different<br />

societies do face similar contingencies <strong>and</strong> adopt similar models, deep-rooted cultural<br />

forces will still re-assert themselves in the way people actually behave <strong>and</strong> relate to each<br />

other’’ (Child <strong>and</strong> Keiser, 1979: 253). The divergence viewpoint argues that<br />

organizations in different countries will vary, influenced by national culture. I adopt the<br />

divergence viewpoint.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!