26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ehrlich et al. (1990) conclude, “It may be that transactional <strong>and</strong> transformational<br />

processes are more interrelated than has been thought when it comes to the behavioural<br />

expressions <strong>of</strong> leaders, as registered in the observations <strong>and</strong> ratings <strong>of</strong> followers.” Kotter<br />

(1990) discussed the frequent confusion amongst differences between management<br />

(transactional behaviour) <strong>and</strong> leadership (transformational behaviour), <strong>and</strong> we see even<br />

as thorough a project as GLOBE including Administrative Competence as a critical<br />

leadership trait. In Figure 6.8 the correlations from Ehrlich et al. <strong>and</strong> Charisma/Extra<br />

Effort are reported in the left column.<br />

Figure 6.8. An Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Relationships amongst the LBDQXII <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Related GLOBE First-Order Dimensions<br />

LBDQXII GLOBE 2<br />

correlations with<br />

Charisma/Extra<br />

Effort<br />

nd<br />

order leadership<br />

scales based on<br />

the 1 st GLOBE: 1<br />

order scale<br />

to the right<br />

st<br />

Example key items in Results in<br />

order leadership GLOBE survey<br />

This Study:<br />

scales<br />

Charisma/Extra Effort dimensions, Ehrlich et al. (1990):<br />

Integration<br />

correlated 0.56;<br />

F11: Integration<br />

reflects to what<br />

degree the manager<br />

maintains a<br />

closely-knit<br />

organisation;<br />

resolves intermember<br />

conflicts.<br />

Initiating<br />

Structure<br />

correlated 0.57, F5:<br />

Initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

Structure measures<br />

to what degree the<br />

manager clearly<br />

defines own role,<br />

<strong>and</strong> lets followers<br />

know what is<br />

expected.<br />

-Team Oriented<br />

-Reverse: Self-<br />

Protective<br />

-Reverse:<br />

Autonomous<br />

-Collaborative<br />

team-oriented<br />

-Reverse:<br />

Conflict inducer<br />

-Reverse:<br />

Autonomous<br />

Team-Oriented Team-integrator<br />

300<br />

-Group-oriented,<br />

collaborative, loyal,<br />

consultative, mediator,<br />

fraternal<br />

-Normative, secretive, <strong>and</strong><br />

an intra-group competitor<br />

-Individualistic,<br />

independent, autonomous,<br />

unique<br />

Communicative, teambuilder,<br />

integrator,<br />

coordinator<br />

Highly<br />

preferred<br />

by both<br />

samples,<br />

ranked 1<br />

for NZ <strong>and</strong><br />

1 equal for<br />

GZ<br />

Highly<br />

preferred<br />

by both<br />

samples

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!