26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the regional context <strong>of</strong> Guangdong Province due to its mix <strong>of</strong> traditional <strong>and</strong> modern<br />

Chinese business tendencies.<br />

Huang (2008) points out that “…many Western economists think China has discovered<br />

its own road to prosperity, dependent largely on state financing <strong>and</strong> control. They are<br />

quite wrong.” In fact, Huang’s research covering the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s indicates that<br />

improved property rights <strong>and</strong> private entrepreneurship provided the dominant stimulus<br />

for high growth <strong>and</strong> lower levels <strong>of</strong> poverty in China since 1979. What actually<br />

happened is that early local experiments with financial liberalization <strong>and</strong> private<br />

ownership, in the 1980s, generated an initial burst <strong>of</strong> rural entrepreneurialism. Those<br />

earlier gains, not the massive state-led infrastructure investments <strong>and</strong> urbanization drive<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 1990s, laid the true foundation for the Chinese miracle. In fact, the city-oriented<br />

programmes in the 1990s led to stagnation in <strong>new</strong> business development by Chinese,<br />

revived by the increasing Government acceptance <strong>and</strong> promotion <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurial<br />

activity.<br />

GOVERNMENT SPONSORED CULTURAL CHANGE<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that Government-sponsored cultural change in China was a failure in<br />

the business community in the 50s <strong>and</strong> 60s, it can be a feasible programme, as when it<br />

changed back to customary Chinese <strong>value</strong>s. Perhaps government-sponsored change<br />

works better in socialist-tradition societies such as China <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> with<br />

difficulty in fully democratic societies. However, in the USA, as an example, female<br />

gender roles have been changed, albeit slowly, since the 1964 Civil Rights Act <strong>and</strong> the<br />

1972 Education Amendment. Both guaranteed ethnic minorities <strong>and</strong> women more<br />

nearly equal rights to men in work <strong>and</strong> education. In another culture, the Japanese Equal<br />

Employment Opportunity Law <strong>of</strong> 1985 has had little if any effect. Discussions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> government policy changing citizens’ behaviour can be reviewed in<br />

Australian Public Service Commission (2007) <strong>and</strong> Askew, Cotterill <strong>and</strong> Greasley<br />

(2009). For change to occur, citizens must recognise a need for a change. How far into<br />

the awareness <strong>of</strong> the general population <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> such studies as<br />

INTOUCH (2008) <strong>and</strong> the Nielsen survey commissioned by New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Trade <strong>and</strong><br />

Enterprise have penetrated is unknown.<br />

312

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!