26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dimensions, developing nine clusters: Near Eastern, Nordic, Arab, Germanic, Far<br />

Eastern, Latin American, Latin European, Anglo, <strong>and</strong> Independent. More recently,<br />

Brodbeck, Frese, Akerblom, Audia, Bakacsi, Bendova et al. (2000) found that<br />

individuals from different regions <strong>value</strong>d different characteristics among leaders. Not all<br />

differences, however, are related to the exercise <strong>of</strong> leadership, <strong>and</strong> recommending<br />

concrete leadership styles on the basis <strong>of</strong> all or most <strong>of</strong> Laurent’s, Ronen <strong>and</strong> Shenkar’s,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Brodbeck et al.’s findings does not appear to be practical. Using H<strong>of</strong>stede’s (1980)<br />

dimensions Early (1993) as an example found significant importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Individualistic versus Collectivistic dimensions in shaping a prescribed leadership style<br />

when a given culture is considered. Project GLOBE (House et al., 2004) identified nine<br />

cultural attributes that have important managerial leadership implications. Project<br />

GLOBE incorporates the research <strong>of</strong> H<strong>of</strong>stede, Trompenaars <strong>and</strong> Hamden-Turner<br />

(1998), <strong>and</strong> Kluckhohn <strong>and</strong> Strodtbeck (1961) where these research teams suggest how<br />

different managerial practices might be received in different cultures.<br />

Many societies believe that the things affecting individuals’ lives reside within the<br />

individual (referred to as internal locus <strong>of</strong> control); in these cultures, motivations <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>value</strong>s are derived from within. Others, in contrast, view the environment as more<br />

powerful <strong>and</strong> influential, wherein the environment, rather than the individual, shapes<br />

outcomes (referred to as external locus <strong>of</strong> control); as an example predominantly<br />

Muslim societies, along with many others, tend to believe that everything is<br />

foreordained by Allah or God, as evidenced by the general use <strong>of</strong> the term Insha’Allah,<br />

“If Allah wills it”. Such a belief has significant effects on motivational aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

leadership (Muczyk <strong>and</strong> Holt, 2008: 279).<br />

THE NEED FOR CROSS-CULTURAL LEADERSHIP THEORY AND RESEARCH<br />

The continuing globalisation <strong>of</strong> business organisations <strong>and</strong> increasing interdependencies<br />

amongst nations means that improving our underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> cultural influences on<br />

leadership <strong>and</strong> organisational practices is important to international business success.<br />

Contemporary managerial leaders <strong>of</strong> international firms face fierce <strong>and</strong> rapidly changing<br />

international competition. Leaders <strong>and</strong> would-be leaders must face complex issues,<br />

which are usually difficult to interpret. International trade has only overcome to some<br />

degree physical distance, not cultural distance. Obviously, effective organisational<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!