26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Linear Regression Results for the Guangzhou Sample: Regression through the Origin<br />

....................................................................................................................................... 339<br />

Linear Regression Results for the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Sample: Regression Through the Origin<br />

....................................................................................................................................... 345<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 351<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 2.1. Relationships <strong>of</strong> Leaders, Approaches, Organisations <strong>and</strong> Followers. ........ 42<br />

Figure 2.2. Correspondences amongst Bass <strong>and</strong> Bass (2008) Components <strong>of</strong> Leadership<br />

<strong>and</strong> the LBDQXII Dimensions ....................................................................................... 50<br />

Figure 2.3. Outline <strong>of</strong> Evolution <strong>of</strong> Trait, Style <strong>and</strong> Style+Contingency Theories ........ 53<br />

Figure 2.4. GLOBE Theoretical Model <strong>of</strong> Leadership <strong>and</strong> Culture ............................... 64<br />

Figure 2.5. The Ecology <strong>of</strong> the International Managerial Leader ................................... 67<br />

Figure 2.5. Spencer <strong>and</strong> Peterson’s (1972) Model <strong>of</strong> Leader Behaviour ........................ 70<br />

Figure 2.6. Portion <strong>of</strong> My Model Tested ........................................................................ 71<br />

Figure 2.7. Schwartz’ Cross-Cultural <strong>and</strong> Individual <strong>value</strong> Dimensions........................ 74<br />

Figure 2.8. Chart <strong>of</strong> SSA Positioning for the 10 Individual Value Dimensions ............. 84<br />

Figure 2.9. Smallest Space Analysis Positioning for Ten Individual Value Dimensions<br />

......................................................................................................................................... 84<br />

Figure 2.10. SVS Individual Values Dimension Structure across 76 Samples from<br />

Validation Study by Fontaine et al. (2008) ..................................................................... 85<br />

Figure 3.1. Models <strong>of</strong> National Cultural Dimension from Nardon <strong>and</strong> Steers (2006),<br />

Hall (1959), <strong>and</strong> Schwartz (1994) ................................................................................... 89<br />

Figure 3.2. Rankings <strong>of</strong> SVS Dimensions from Relevant Studies <strong>of</strong> Chinese<br />

Businesspeople by z-Scores <strong>and</strong> Raw Scores ............................................................... 104<br />

Figure 3.3. China <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Samples Available in Schwartz’ Database ......... 107<br />

Figure 3.4. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Schwartz’ Teacher & Student Samples in China ............... 108<br />

Figure 3.5. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Sample Means for Teachers, Students <strong>and</strong> Businesspeople in<br />

China ............................................................................................................................. 109<br />

Figure 3.6. Comparison <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Samples from Schwartz’ Database .............. 110<br />

Figure 3.7. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Sample Results from China (Red Graphs) <strong>and</strong> NZ (Blue<br />

Graphs) from Schwartz’ Public Database ..................................................................... 111<br />

Figure 3.8. ANOVA Tests <strong>of</strong> Between-Subjects Effects for Schwartz’ Theory<br />

Development Samples for MRAT-Centred Score Means ............................................. 112<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!