26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

attributes that are believed to determine the relevant outcome(s). For example,<br />

Mintzberg (1979) identified five types <strong>of</strong> organizational structures that are<br />

hypothesized to result in maximal organizational effectiveness, <strong>and</strong> Porter<br />

(1980, 1985) identified three strategies that are hypothesized to maximize<br />

competitive advantage.<br />

� Topology is a descriptive process placing entities in physical relationships with<br />

other entities in two-, three-, or multi-dimensional space. For a topology to be<br />

considered a theory the physical relationships must remain constant in relation to<br />

relevant independent variables. Topology can be characterised as the study <strong>of</strong><br />

continuity to non-mathematicians, as relationships are based upon, for example,<br />

Euclidian distance rather than categories, or as the formal study <strong>of</strong> the features<br />

<strong>of</strong> geometrical figures that remain invariant under spatial transformations to<br />

mathematicians. Blackwell (2004) provides a relatively non-technical<br />

introduction. In social psychology, Lewin (1936) <strong>and</strong> Schwartz (1992, 1994)<br />

have developed topological theories. Social network analysis, the formal study<br />

<strong>of</strong> systems <strong>of</strong> people based upon their relationships, frequently employs<br />

topological descriptions, <strong>and</strong> occasionally explanations.<br />

Given that these processes are antecedents to theory development, Bass <strong>and</strong> Bass (2008:<br />

15-23) propose a list <strong>of</strong> the processes defining leadership, that is essentially a typology.<br />

This is a start for the development <strong>of</strong> a scientific theory from the typology. I will now<br />

relate this list to the LBDQXII dimensions validating the instrument as an effective<br />

operationalisation <strong>of</strong> a framework that will be developed into a theory <strong>of</strong> preferred<br />

explicit leader behaviour, based upon the Ohio State leader behaviour project.<br />

Leadership <strong>and</strong> Management<br />

Leadership <strong>and</strong> management behaviour at the macro level can be defined from the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> Kotter (1990), who presents a model identifying processes. Kotter’s<br />

discussion is chosen as being succinct <strong>and</strong> comprehensive.<br />

Kotter’s (1990) Harvard Business Review article, “What Leaders Really Do”, tells us<br />

leadership <strong>and</strong> management are two distinctive <strong>and</strong> complementary systems <strong>of</strong> action<br />

(that is, action, behaviour, not traits, characteristics, or styles), each with its own<br />

function <strong>and</strong> characteristic activities. Leadership is different from management, but not<br />

better than management, or a replacement for it; both are required to manage large,<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!