26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An additional issue <strong>of</strong> concern is country as a monolithic cultural unit. Few researchers<br />

accept this; many ignore the implications.<br />

COUNTRIES AS CULTURAL UNITS<br />

The validity <strong>of</strong> “The Nation-State as a Useful Variable in Cross-Cultural Behavioural<br />

Research” is discussed further on p. 183 <strong>and</strong> following pages. Regardless <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questions as to the validity <strong>of</strong> a nation as a single variable, almost all large, <strong>comparative</strong>,<br />

cross-cultural studies treat countries as their cultural unit. Countries are rarely<br />

homogeneous societies with a unified culture. Inferences about national culture may<br />

depend on which subgroups are studied. The research on Schwartz’ cultural dimensions<br />

with the SVS used country scores from teacher <strong>and</strong> student samples rather than<br />

representative national samples. This makes it especially important to establish that<br />

scores derived from different types <strong>of</strong> samples order countries in the same way on the<br />

dimensions. If a meaningful general culture influences upon varied groups within<br />

countries, the order <strong>of</strong> countries on cultural dimensions should be quite similar whether<br />

we measure culture using one type <strong>of</strong> subsample from the dominant group or another.<br />

The same countries should score higher <strong>and</strong> the same countries lower on each cultural<br />

orientation whether the set <strong>of</strong> samples consists, for example, <strong>of</strong> older or <strong>of</strong> younger<br />

respondents. Schwartz (2006) assessed consistency in the relative scores <strong>of</strong> countries on<br />

his seven cultural orientations measured with the SVS, using three types <strong>of</strong> subsamples,<br />

secondary school teachers, <strong>and</strong> tertiary students. Schwartz stated that closely matching<br />

the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the samples from each country is critical when comparing national<br />

cultural orientations, e.g., all teacher samples, all student samples, or all properly drawn<br />

national samples.<br />

CLUSTERS OF CULTURES<br />

Several authors propose that there are culturally distinct world regions with similar<br />

cultures (H<strong>of</strong>stede, 2001; Huntington, 1993; Inglehart, 1997; Schwartz, 1999). The<br />

major theorists map national cultures into clusters. H<strong>of</strong>stede, Inglehart, Schwartz <strong>and</strong><br />

the GLOBE project identify cultural regions around the world generally as African,<br />

Confucian, Ex-Communist East-Central European, Anglo or English-Speaking, Latin<br />

American, South Asian, <strong>and</strong> West European. There is still sparse data concerning the<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!