26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABSTRACT<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this thesis project is to carry out research, analysis <strong>and</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

the nature <strong>and</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> cultural influences on individual <strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

preferred explicit managerial leader behaviour <strong>of</strong> businesspeople in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Guangzhou City, China. In the course <strong>of</strong> the investigation theories <strong>of</strong> cultural <strong>value</strong><br />

dimensions <strong>and</strong> leader behaviour theories are reviewed. Shalom Schwartz’ theory <strong>of</strong><br />

individual <strong>value</strong>s within national cultures <strong>and</strong> the Ohio State explicit leader behaviour<br />

theories are employed as the tools for the study. Investigations <strong>of</strong> the validity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

theories are carried out <strong>and</strong> reported, along with analyses <strong>and</strong> interpretations <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

field research survey instruments operationalising the theories, the Schwartz Values<br />

Survey (SVS) <strong>and</strong> the Leader Behaviour Description Questionnaire XII (LBDQXII).<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the study indicate that neither <strong>of</strong> the theories or the survey instruments<br />

produces <strong>value</strong> <strong>and</strong> leader behaviour dimension structures that are invariant between the<br />

two samples <strong>of</strong> businesspeople. The invariance is not debilitating, <strong>and</strong> the theories <strong>and</strong><br />

survey instruments produce useful comparisons <strong>of</strong> adequate validity <strong>and</strong> reliability to<br />

provide useful descriptions <strong>of</strong> differences in preferred leader behaviours between New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Guangzhou businesspeople. Based upon interpretation <strong>of</strong> these differences,<br />

suggestions are made concerning managerial leader behaviour suitable in managing <strong>and</strong><br />

leading subordinates from each society. An adjunct to the study is investigation <strong>and</strong><br />

validation <strong>of</strong> deficiencies in effectiveness <strong>of</strong> business leader behaviour in New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

identified by survey research studies interviewing samples <strong>of</strong> managers in countries<br />

important to New Zeal<strong>and</strong>’s international businesspeople; some consistent attitudinal<br />

<strong>and</strong> behavioural problems are identified related to <strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> national character.<br />

The project is not directed at assessing organisational behaviour. It is directed toward<br />

identifying relationships amongst preferred leader behaviour <strong>priorities</strong> <strong>and</strong> individual<br />

<strong>value</strong> <strong>priorities</strong> in culture areas represented by two samples <strong>of</strong> businesspeople. When<br />

businesspeople from the two culture areas engage with one another in leadership,<br />

management, <strong>and</strong> commercial processes <strong>and</strong> transactions, differences in opinions<br />

attitudes, beliefs, <strong>and</strong> behaviour will be encountered that are attributable to individual<br />

<strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> preferred leader behaviour dimensions. Differences in preferred leader<br />

behaviour are identified <strong>and</strong> these differences are related to individual <strong>value</strong> <strong>priorities</strong><br />

between the two samples. These differences are framed in the context <strong>of</strong> a theory <strong>of</strong><br />

individual <strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> a theory <strong>of</strong> preferred leader behaviour. From the outcomes<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!