26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lee <strong>and</strong> Soutar (2009) discuss scaling issues with the SVS <strong>and</strong> with Likert scales in<br />

general. They demonstrate that in fact the SVS item scales are designed not to be<br />

interval but ordinal. Nonetheless, to conform to current practice in the SVS literature I<br />

will employ parametric statistics for hypothesis testing <strong>of</strong> questions relating central<br />

tendencies <strong>of</strong> the samples.<br />

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISONS<br />

In order to assess the extent to which items have their expected meanings, it is desirable<br />

to do a Smallest Space structural analysis within each sample. This reveals the structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> relations amongst Schwartz’ ten SVS <strong>value</strong>s <strong>and</strong> clarifies whether there are problems<br />

in using the st<strong>and</strong>ard a priori indexes for group comparisons.<br />

In this research project SVS surveys are being employed to compare r<strong>and</strong>omly selected<br />

businesspeople’s responses to the SVS in Guangzhou, China, <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, with<br />

the intent <strong>of</strong> discussing behavioural expectations in business transactions between<br />

people in Chinese-located <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>-located organisations. Due to the<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> significantly different culture areas in China discussed above, with, a<br />

single region was selected due to cost <strong>of</strong> data collection considerations. I believe that a<br />

single score for each dimension in China would be a statistical artefact, <strong>and</strong> not<br />

representative <strong>of</strong> the country, as the country does not have a monolithic culture.<br />

Response Sets for the Two Samples on the Two Surveys<br />

Inspecting Figure 4.14, depicting the response set for the two samples for the SVS, we<br />

see that the Guangzhou sample tended to use a wider range <strong>of</strong> anchors than did the New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> Sample. This is also true for the LBDQXII responses.<br />

The SVS survey instructions could have an effect on response set. They consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />

In this questionnaire you are to ask yourself: “What <strong>value</strong>s are<br />

important to ME as guiding principles in MY life, <strong>and</strong> what <strong>value</strong>s are<br />

less important to me?” There are two lists <strong>of</strong> <strong>value</strong>s on the following<br />

pages. These <strong>value</strong>s come from different cultures. In the parentheses<br />

following each <strong>value</strong> is an explanation that may help you to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> its meaning.<br />

Your task is to rate how important each <strong>value</strong> is for you as a guiding<br />

principle in your life. Use the rating scale below:<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!