26.11.2012 Views

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

comparative value priorities of chinese and new zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dimensions suggested by Ehrlich et al. are not consistently highly ranked by either<br />

sample. Concerning preferred behaviour for a charisma dimension, further research <strong>and</strong><br />

development is required.<br />

Gender<br />

The Schwartz <strong>value</strong>s theory does not consider gender other than as an independent<br />

variable. House et al. (2004) found in the mean “as is” culture dimension scores, China<br />

was very low in Gender Egalitarianism <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> was low. In H<strong>of</strong>stede <strong>and</strong><br />

H<strong>of</strong>stede (2005), both China <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> had moderate Masculinity/Femininity<br />

means, mid-range amongst all countries with scores. Two hypotheses were proposed,<br />

one for the LBDQXII <strong>and</strong> one for the SVS.<br />

Aanalyses <strong>of</strong> both gender sub-sample centred score means <strong>and</strong> dimension ranks for the<br />

LBDQXII found few significant differences for the gender x dimension analyses for the<br />

Guangzhou sample, <strong>and</strong> no significant differences for the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> sample. For GZ,<br />

men had significantly higher average rankings for Tolerance <strong>of</strong> Freedom <strong>and</strong><br />

Consideration.<br />

For the SVS <strong>value</strong> dimensions there were no differences for Conformity <strong>and</strong> Tradition<br />

<strong>value</strong>s. Analyses <strong>of</strong> both gender sub-sample centred score means <strong>and</strong> ranks for the SVS<br />

found significant differences for the gender x dimension analyses for the Guangzhou<br />

sample, but no significant differences for the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> sample. For GZ, men had<br />

significantly higher average rankings for Hedonism <strong>and</strong> women had higher rankings for<br />

Power. For leader preferences, Females in Guangzhou had significantly lower Tolerance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Freedom means <strong>and</strong> Consideration means, “tougher” <strong>value</strong>s than men.<br />

Since the 1980s, some researchers have suggested that leadership traits <strong>and</strong> behaviours<br />

are associated with males (e.g., Baumgardner, Lord <strong>and</strong> Maher, 1991; Hall, Workman<br />

<strong>and</strong> Marchioro, 1998). Early studies have also suggested that males <strong>and</strong> females tend to<br />

differ in personality characteristics <strong>and</strong> this might affect their leadership styles<br />

(H<strong>of</strong>fman, 1977; Maier, 1970). Some researchers argue that males <strong>and</strong> females differ in<br />

what they view as an effective leader. Due to different social experiences <strong>and</strong><br />

expectations, females tend to be raised <strong>and</strong> socialized to be more dependent <strong>and</strong><br />

nurturing whereas males tend to be raised <strong>and</strong> socialized to be more independent <strong>and</strong><br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!