28.11.2017 Views

Enayam Port

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tamil Research Institute<br />

RAPID TECHNO-ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF COLACHEL PORT AT TAMILNADU<br />

FINAL REPORT<br />

others, this fact can influence the geotechnical design of pile foundations (the total pile length will vary with the<br />

specific location of the rock).<br />

Thus, the proposed profile must be assumed just as a first approach of the average geotechnical conditions at<br />

the site, to be confirmed in further phases of the project.<br />

7.4.6. Geotechnical risks<br />

From a geotechnical point of view, the main risks to be considered in further stages of the project can be<br />

summarized as follows:<br />

• Presence of rock or hard materials in the area to be dredged, which would involve an important impact on<br />

the cost and performance of the dredging works.<br />

• Presence of soft or very loose materials in the locations of breakwaters, berths, or earthfills, which may<br />

require special foundations or ground treatments to guarantee the structural requirements.<br />

• Steeply sloping seafloors and accompanying down-slope soil movements can cause additional lateral pile<br />

forces in the down-slope direction. Also, steep sloping makes the area more vulnerable to instability<br />

induced by the seismic activity of wave forces.<br />

• Scouring of near-surface soils can occur and can be accentuated in the vicinity of piles. The extent of the<br />

scouring depends on the velocity of seafloor currents, the type of soil and the size and configuration of pile<br />

groups.<br />

• Earthquake-related hazards should be assessed in seismically active areas. Earthquake motions may cause<br />

partial loss of strength or complete liquefaction in loose granular soil zones, essentially removing soil<br />

support developed in these zones.<br />

• Gneisses are more susceptible to weathering compared to massive charnockites. Erosion in gneiss areas is<br />

higher than in charnockite areas, therefore rivers in gneiss areas are prone to transporting more sediments<br />

than those in charnockite areas.<br />

The table below shows a general assessment of the geotechnical risks described above. More detailed analyses<br />

should be developed in further stages of the project, based on the results of the geotechnical field investigation<br />

(boreholes, trial pits, geophysical profiles, etc.).<br />

% rock near surface<br />

Thick deposits of<br />

sediments<br />

Steeply sloping<br />

seafloor<br />

Type of rock (weather<br />

susceptibility)<br />

Grade Low Low Low Moderate<br />

7.5. LAND AVAILABILITY<br />

Table 16: Geotechnical risks.<br />

As the port is to be developed entirely on reclaimed land, no land acquisition is envisaged for the port<br />

development. However, the project shadow area can impact fishermen dwellings.<br />

Coastal land from Colachel to <strong>Enayam</strong> would change to a port area. As a result of the Project development, this<br />

part of the sea coast and beaches would be permanently lost during the construction and operation of the<br />

Project.<br />

116<br />

www.tamilri.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!