28.11.2017 Views

Enayam Port

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tamil Research Institute<br />

RAPID TECHNO-ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR<br />

DEVELOPMENT OF COLACHEL PORT AT TAMILNADU<br />

FINAL REPORT<br />

100.0<br />

90.0<br />

80.0<br />

70.0<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

All the factors<br />

weight the same<br />

Environmental and<br />

social factors<br />

weights the same<br />

Expert judgement.<br />

Figure 63. Results from the Sensitive analysis.<br />

4.5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The best rated alternative location, with the lowest impact, is <strong>Enayam</strong>, while the worst rated one, with the highest<br />

impact, is Colachel. Kanyakumari and Manavalakurichi obtained similar intermediate ratings. The <strong>Enayam</strong><br />

location has lower environmental impacts than the others with respect to dredging, cultural sites and its low<br />

impact on property due to its low population. <strong>Port</strong> expansion will not need a wide extra inland area since the<br />

land reclamation area will provide room for port facilities and industries.<br />

The Manavalakurichi location has lower environmental impacts than Kanyakumari with respect to, tourism and<br />

cultural sites and lower environmental impacts. Manavalakurichi has lower environmental impacts than <strong>Enayam</strong><br />

with respect to coastline and fishing. This is due to its special configuration whereby the port is not attached to<br />

the coastline and connects inland via a bridge that allows the transport of sediments and therefore has a lower<br />

effect on coastal processes. Its inland population density which could be affected by the expansion of the port is<br />

lower than in Colachel and Kanyakumari.<br />

The Kanyakumari location was better rated in regards to its proximity to the transport network and because the<br />

coastline is more poorly preserved. In any case, a more in-depth weighting of the touristic and cultural factor<br />

would rule out this option.<br />

The Colachel location is the worst rated due to its possible impact on the surrounding beaches, which are in an<br />

suitable state of preservation and where there is fishing. The beach located to the east of the port location would<br />

become a pocket beach, retaining its sand and quality, but would be disconnected from the natural coastal<br />

dynamics. In addition, the port is located right next to the heritage town of Colachel, with a dense population<br />

and therefore with the potential to impact on underground water resources<br />

CP1832-FR-AX-05-CP-Initial Environmental Examination-Ed4.docx AX05 - 114 114<br />

www.tamilri.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!