Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover Entwicklung von Methoden zur ...

LITERATURVERZEICHNIS
MUELLER, K. (1998):
Fast and Accurate Three-Dimensional Reconstruction from cone-beam projection data using
algebraic methods.
Columbus, Ohio, The Ohio State University, Diss., 132 S.
MÜLLER, R., M. HAHN, M. VOGEL, G. DELLING u. P. RÜEGSEGGER (1996):
Morphometric analysis of noninvasively assessed bone biopsies: comparison of highresolution
computed tomography and histologic sections.
Bone. 18, 215-220
OEST, M. E., J. C. JONES, C. HATFIELD, u. M. R. PRATER (2008):
Micro-CT evaluation of murine fetal skeletal development yields greater morphometric
precision over traditional clear-staining methods.
Birth Defects Res. B. Dev. Reprod. Toxicol. 83, 582-589
OKUMURA, M., T. OTA, K. KAINUMA, J. W. SAYRE, M. MCNITT-GRAY, u. K.
KATADA (2008):
Effect of Edge-Preserving Adaptive Image Filter on Low-Contrast Detectability in CT
Systems: Application of ROC Analysis.
Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2008, 379486
OPPELT, A. (2005):
Imaging systems for medical diagnostics: Fundamentals, Technical Solutions and
Applications for Systems Applying Ionizing Radiation, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and
Ultrasound.
1. Aufl. Verlag Publicis Corporate Pub., Erlangen
PATEL, V., K. R. HOFFMANN, C. N. IONITA, C. KELESHIS, D. R. BEDNAREK, u. S.
RUDIN (2008):
Rotational micro-CT using a clinical C-arm angiography gantry.
Med. Phys. 35, 4757-4764
PHAN, C. M., M. MATSUURA, J. S. BAUER, T. C. DUNN, D. NEWITT, E. M.
LOCHMUELLER, F. ECKSTEIN, S. MAJUMDAR, u. T. M. LINK (2006):
Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MR imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with
micro-CT as the standard of reference.
Radiology 239, 488-496
POHLE, R. (2004):
Computerunterstützte Bildanalyse zur Auswertung medizinischer Bilddaten.
Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Habil.-Schr.
POSTNOV, A., A. ZAROWSKI, N. DE CLERCK, F. VANPOUCKE, F. E. OFFECIERS, D.
VAN DYCK, u. S. PEETERS (2006):
High resolution micro-CT scanning as an innovative tool for evaluation of the surgical
positioning of cochlear implant electrodes.
Acta Otolaryngol. 126, 467-474
158