26.12.2013 Views

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106.<br />

took over <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> reason as an arbiter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs and that this<br />

lessened <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> a moral free-far-all. His answer to <strong>the</strong> charge that<br />

moral pr<strong>in</strong>ciples have a universal and law-like character <strong>in</strong> comparison<br />

with feel<strong>in</strong>gs which are particular and variable vms to agree that if<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is to be a stability <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between right and ?;rong,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re must be a consistency <strong>in</strong> human nature. He found this consisteney<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that man was "on balance more <strong>of</strong> a social be<strong>in</strong>g than<br />

not" and that his actions, <strong>the</strong>refore, 'were more likely to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> society<br />

than to destroy it. 33 The importance <strong>of</strong> man's social role was, as<br />

we have seen, very much a part <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century discussions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

moral sense. 'rhe two ma<strong>in</strong> contributions to <strong>the</strong> development '<strong>of</strong> moral<br />

philosophy <strong>in</strong> our time <strong>of</strong> those who submitted <strong>the</strong> claim that man is<br />

possessed <strong>of</strong> a moral sense were that <strong>the</strong>y stressed <strong>the</strong> notion that<br />

\!<br />

"morality assumes <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> society and is <strong>in</strong>comprehensible apart<br />

from this propositiont' and <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>sistence that "feel<strong>in</strong>g has a place <strong>in</strong><br />

morality." 34 The follow<strong>in</strong>g quotation from <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong>'s ess?y on Young<br />

rem<strong>in</strong>ds us how important moral feel<strong>in</strong>g was to her. She claims that "<strong>in</strong><br />

proportion as morality is emotional, it will exhibit itself <strong>in</strong> direct<br />

sympa<strong>the</strong>tic feel<strong>in</strong>g and action, and not as <strong>the</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> a rule.<br />

Love does not say, 'I ought to love'--it loves. Pity does not say, 'It<br />

is right to be pitiful'--it pities. Justice does not say, 'I am bound<br />

to be just' --it feels justly." 35<br />

By this brief <strong>in</strong>cursion <strong>in</strong>to eighteenth century moral philosophy I<br />

have wanted to show <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>of</strong> moral <strong>the</strong>ories between one century<br />

and <strong>the</strong> next. The <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral sense is vulnerable to certa<strong>in</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> criticism and <strong>the</strong> way <strong>in</strong> which Hume, <strong>in</strong> particular, dealt vlith<br />

<strong>the</strong>se criticisms adumbrates some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difficulties faced b;,{ _<strong>George</strong><br />

<strong>Eliot</strong> and her contemporaries. They, likevlise, had to deal with <strong>the</strong><br />

problem <strong>of</strong> relativism if <strong>the</strong> moral sense was seen to be primarily a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!