26.12.2013 Views

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

"Stran{Se, that some <strong>of</strong> us, II vll'ites <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong> <strong>in</strong> I.1idd.lemarch,<br />

"with quick alternate vision, see beyond our <strong>in</strong>fatuations, and even while<br />

we rave on <strong>the</strong> heights, behold <strong>the</strong> wide pla<strong>in</strong> "where our persistent self<br />

pauses and awaits us." 1 (my italics) This <strong>in</strong>dication that we have a<br />

"persistent self" <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>r references throu{Shout<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>novels</strong>, to "Better selves,1I 2 u\'lorse selves," 3 "<strong>in</strong>ner selves," 4<br />

and "past selves, II 5 suggests stron~ly that <strong>in</strong> G-eorge <strong>Eliot</strong> t s view <strong>the</strong><br />

self is a stable entity_ This does not, <strong>of</strong> course, preclude <strong>the</strong> possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> matur<strong>in</strong>g or grow<strong>in</strong>g. "Character," after all, as she tells<br />

us,<br />

"is not cut <strong>in</strong> marble"; 6 it is a "process and an unfold<strong>in</strong>g." 7<br />

The embryological image <strong>in</strong>dicates a bluepr<strong>in</strong>t for change vdth<strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong><br />

fixed limits. Describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong> t s "stable core <strong>of</strong> ego, II 8 W. J_<br />

Harvey comments that<br />

Her characters may ask <strong>the</strong>mselves, lr~Vhere or why did I go wrong<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past?" But <strong>the</strong>y do not ask <strong>the</strong> prior questions, IIYmo was<br />

that tIt which went "wrong <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past',? How is that tI' related<br />

to <strong>the</strong> present 'I' which asks <strong>the</strong> question? How far is <strong>the</strong><br />

present 'I' responsible for what that totally different past 'I'<br />

did?" Of course, th:1:s is not to say that <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong> ••• denies<br />

<strong>the</strong> facts <strong>of</strong> change and development. But change is still reconciled<br />

to <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> a stable ego; one's identity lies precisely<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> unique pattern <strong>of</strong> past changes whiqh constitutes one's<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuality. 9<br />

This is a far remove from Humets "bundle"<br />

10<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> self, constantly<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g, and given an illus~ cohesion only by memory patterns<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. Evolutionary psychology emphasised <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong><br />

ancestral tendencies and patterns <strong>of</strong> response (Spencer's "partially-<br />

. t dn" 11) 1 ~ ·1' , . t 1 th t th .<br />

~nna e prepare ess ; nne. my ana ys~s maKes ~ c ear a ase ~nherited<br />

characteristics were thought <strong>of</strong> as serv<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tegrative flimction.<br />

They provided <strong>the</strong> base l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a triangle; but <strong>the</strong> angles distended from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!