26.12.2013 Views

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

225.<br />

stra<strong>in</strong>ed. I have also <strong>in</strong>dicated that choos<strong>in</strong>g to surrender one's will,<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r it is done for moral or spiritual reasons, mlso <strong>in</strong>evitably<br />

implies a loss <strong>of</strong> freedom. It now rema<strong>in</strong>s for me to substantiate this<br />

claim that <strong>the</strong> technique by whioh Q.eorge <strong>Eliot</strong> has chosen to present<br />

Maggie to us, based on <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> psychological determ<strong>in</strong>ism, leaves<br />

her less free to choose than o<strong>the</strong>r morally evolved hero<strong>in</strong>es, Es<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Lyon, or Romola, or Doro<strong>the</strong>a, and <strong>in</strong> fact as restrioted <strong>in</strong> her freedom<br />

as Arthur Donnithorne or Tito Melema.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to W. J. Harvey, "<strong>the</strong> two most important fa.ctors determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> a.~<br />

oharacter are ••• <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> ohoioes open to <strong>the</strong><br />

oharaoter and <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> ohooser he is, as shown by <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong><br />

choices displayed by him or imputed to him <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past." 46 One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts about Maggie as a ohooser is <strong>the</strong> division <strong>in</strong> her behaviour<br />

effected by her adoption <strong>of</strong> ~ Imitation <strong>of</strong> Christ as a guide.<br />

Before this time she is wilful, impetuous and assertive; she cuts her<br />

hair, spills grav,y over <strong>the</strong> hated cast-<strong>of</strong>f dress <strong>of</strong> aunt Glegg, pushes<br />

Lucy <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> mud, and runs away to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gypsies. While <strong>the</strong>se actions<br />

do not manifest ~ real deliberate choice (<strong>the</strong>y are all ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

spontaneous attempts to solve impossible problems) <strong>the</strong>y are undeniably<br />

<strong>the</strong> aotions <strong>of</strong> a passionate and impulsive girl. Her decisions after read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Thomas 'a Kempis are <strong>of</strong> a different nature; th;ey are no more choices<br />

than <strong>the</strong>se previous acts <strong>of</strong> o<strong>of</strong>ianoe but <strong>the</strong>y are shorn <strong>of</strong> any wilfulness<br />

or impetuosity. They constitute non-aotions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir passivity and<br />

submissiveness, a follow<strong>in</strong>g a l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> least resistanoe. Her o~ action,<br />

her decision to teaoh ra<strong>the</strong>r than live with Tom or aunt Glegg, is reported<br />

retrospeotively so that we do not see any struggle she may have<br />

had to assert her will. When she ttohooses" to see Philip, it is only be --<br />

~<br />

taqSe she snatches at his sophist~ that if he should oome along that way<br />

/""<br />

",~"..<<br />

and meet her by aocident <strong>the</strong>n that would not be her fault. She does not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!