26.12.2013 Views

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

64.<br />

development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Earth, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> Life upon its surface,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> Society , <strong>of</strong> GoveZ'nment , <strong>of</strong> Manufaotures, <strong>of</strong><br />

Commerce, <strong>of</strong> Language, Literature, Science, Art, this same evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simple <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> complex, through successive differentiations,<br />

holds throughout. 'I 28 This essay cont<strong>in</strong>ues to enlarge and illustrate<br />

this <strong>the</strong>me until it arrives at <strong>the</strong> conclusion that .lIprogress is not<br />

an accident, not a th<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> human control, but a beneficent necessity."<br />

29<br />

After such a example <strong>of</strong> facile optiBism, a comment from <strong>the</strong> twentiethcentury<br />

geneticist, Peter Medawar, is pert<strong>in</strong>ent. It :'Ls lIa pr<strong>of</strong>ound truth, II<br />

he ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s, "realised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteer::th century by only a ha.."ldf'ul <strong>of</strong><br />

astute biologists and by philosophers hardly at all, •• that nature does<br />

~ know best, that genetical evolution, if we choose to look at it<br />

liverishly <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> with fatuous good humoUr, is a story <strong>of</strong> waste,<br />

k h · ft . d bl d II 30 D . . Th Or" f S .<br />

rna es 1. ,comprOml.se, an un er. arW1.n ~n _.:~ ._ :.g~n ~ peC1.es<br />

avoids almost entirely suoh IIfatuous good humour" as well as <strong>the</strong> irnplicitly<br />

teleological bias <strong>of</strong> Spencer t s thought ..<br />

However tl::.e conclud<strong>in</strong>g section<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work does conta<strong>in</strong> this capitulatory remark:<br />

s natural selection<br />

works solely by and for <strong>the</strong> good <strong>of</strong> each be<strong>in</strong>g, all corporeal and mental<br />

endowments will tend to progress towards perfection." 31 This remr::..rksits<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r oddly alongside an earlier a.."ld more representative one, <strong>the</strong>t<br />

"natural selection tends only to make each organic be<strong>in</strong>g as perfect as,<br />

or slightly more perfect than, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same country<br />

with which it comes <strong>in</strong>to competition.tI<br />

Gordon Haight claims that <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong> Itsaw at 0110e what Huxley admitted<br />

years later, that <strong>the</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fittest is not always <strong>the</strong><br />

survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best. 11 ~3.'This oontention is borne by ,<strong>George</strong>, <strong>Eliot</strong>'s<br />

comment from a letter <strong>of</strong> 1867 that t'nat;':lral seleotion is not always<br />

good, and depends (see Darw<strong>in</strong>) on many., caprices <strong>of</strong>· very~ foo1i.sh;;.KClimal.s~ t,)3/+

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!