A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot
A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot
A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116.<br />
between two oppos<strong>in</strong>g ethical views. In <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century <strong>the</strong>re were<br />
two schools, "<strong>the</strong>!<strong>in</strong>tellectual' and <strong>the</strong> t sentimental' ••• represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
two pr<strong>in</strong>cipal l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> thought •••• They are primarily dist<strong>in</strong>guished by<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir adoption <strong>of</strong> reason and feel<strong>in</strong>e respectively as <strong>the</strong> faculty which<br />
perceives moral dist<strong>in</strong>ctions, a faculty declared <strong>in</strong> each case to be<br />
peculiar and not identifiable with ord<strong>in</strong>ary reason or ord<strong>in</strong>ary feel<strong>in</strong>g. II<br />
70<br />
We have seen <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong>'s allegiance to <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> a moral sense<br />
and <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> sympathy. Let us now consider how far it is possible<br />
to identify certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tuitionist tendencies <strong>in</strong> her thought, before<br />
briefly exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> moral position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century <strong>in</strong>tellect-<br />
001 school.<br />
There is a famous authorial passage <strong>in</strong> ~ ~ ~ ~ Floss, for<br />
example, where <strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong> contrasts rigid rule-dom<strong>in</strong>ated moral judgements<br />
with judgements reached by <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> lI<strong>in</strong>sight and sympathy.1I<br />
All men <strong>of</strong> broad, strong sense have an <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctive repugnance to<br />
<strong>the</strong> men <strong>of</strong> maxims; because such people early discern that <strong>the</strong><br />
mysterious complexity <strong>of</strong> our life is not to be embraced by maxims,<br />
and that to lace ourselves up <strong>in</strong> formulas <strong>of</strong> that sort is to<br />
repress all <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e prompt<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>spirations that spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sieht and sympathy. And <strong>the</strong> man <strong>of</strong> maxims is <strong>the</strong><br />
popular representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ds that are guided <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
moral judgement solely by general rules, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
will lead <strong>the</strong>m to justice by a ready-made patent method, without<br />
<strong>the</strong> trouble <strong>of</strong> exert<strong>in</strong>g patience, discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, impartiality-<br />
without any care to assure <strong>the</strong>mselves whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>sight that comes from a hardly-earned estimate <strong>of</strong> temptation, or<br />
from a life vivid and <strong>in</strong>tense enough to have created a wide<br />
fellow-feel<strong>in</strong>g v'lith all that is human. 71 (my italics)<br />
<strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong>' 5 use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word "<strong>in</strong>sight" <strong>in</strong> this passage raises <strong>the</strong> question<br />
<strong>of</strong> how far she would have described <strong>the</strong> moral faculty as analogous<br />
with <strong>the</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary faculty <strong>of</strong> sight. As P. Nov:ell-Smith states, "<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tuitionist<br />
is not draw<strong>in</strong>g our attention to <strong>the</strong> obvious fact that we<br />
have moral experience; he is <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g us to construe this experience •••<br />
as be<strong>in</strong>g analogous to see<strong>in</strong>e_ Moral judgements are reports <strong>of</strong> what we<br />
see when we look at <strong>the</strong> non-natural Vlorld <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same S9rt <strong>of</strong> way that