26.12.2013 Views

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.<br />

realistic an appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> immensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> task to do that--but she<br />

would have conourred "lith <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g sentiment. She expressed herself<br />

<strong>in</strong> agreement, for example, "lith <strong>the</strong> IIfundamental doctr<strong>in</strong>e" <strong>of</strong> Charles<br />

Bray's book, ~ Philosophy .2!. Necessity (1841), that "<strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d presents<br />

itself under <strong>the</strong> same condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>variableness <strong>of</strong> antecedent and consoquentas<br />

all o<strong>the</strong>r phenomena, 'I but qualified this with <strong>the</strong> rider that<br />

mental phenomena are "proportionately difficult to discover as [}hey ar!J ~<br />

more complex." 7 But she and Lewes were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vanguard <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenthcentury<br />

thought <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir acceptance that <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d was subject to <strong>the</strong><br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g laws that obta<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> physical organism. O<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>kers<br />

were more cautious. N<strong>in</strong>eteenth-eentury th<strong>in</strong>kers who were concerned with<br />

<strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d fall <strong>in</strong>to two catEt8ories. The first were philosophers,<br />

castigated by Francis Gall for work<strong>in</strong>g "<strong>in</strong> a closet." 8 In this<br />

group belong Auguste Comte, <strong>the</strong> Mills, and Herbert Spencer. The o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

group consists <strong>of</strong> scientists actively engaged <strong>in</strong> neurophysiological<br />

experimentation and researoh. Lev.es is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g because he <strong>in</strong>itially<br />

belonged to <strong>the</strong> first category but he was mortified by Huxley's description<br />

<strong>of</strong> him as a mere ''book scientist" 9 and became <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly cccupied<br />

with genu<strong>in</strong>e research.<br />

Most n<strong>in</strong>eteenth-century th<strong>in</strong>kers, philosophers or scientists, were<br />

bedevilled by <strong>the</strong> basic assumption that <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d v~s<br />

somehow a separate<br />

entity, or even, as Lewes scath<strong>in</strong>gly puts it, an "abstraction. 1t 10 Even<br />

a brief survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth-century neurophysiology<br />

reveals that as physical researoh <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> became<br />

more detailed and acourate, <strong>the</strong> scientists had to struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

wish to deny <strong>the</strong> evidence that <strong>the</strong> cerebral cortex was <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sensory-motor functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body. G. H. Lewes stands out <strong>in</strong> this<br />

connection for his unflagg<strong>in</strong>g missionary zeal to persuade his readers<br />

to accept <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d as a "function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organism." 11 In his 1845

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!