26.12.2013 Views

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

A study of characterisation in the novels of George Eliot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 ...<br />

<strong>Eliot</strong> translates particular ideas <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> texture <strong>of</strong> a novel, reveal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> particular moral dilemmas faced by <strong>in</strong>dividual characters. Her moral ,·i<br />

ii'<br />

bias was to reject rigid rules and precepts and to focus on fellowship<br />

and sympathy. We see fur<strong>the</strong>r evidence <strong>of</strong> this <strong>in</strong> her <strong>of</strong>ten expressed<br />

responsibility tow~ds her readers, and her deliberate aim <strong>of</strong> enlarg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir moral sensibilities .and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir capacity for sympathy.<br />

<strong>George</strong> <strong>Eliot</strong>ts moral position, looked at <strong>in</strong> general terms, relates<br />

to <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century attempt, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional<br />

belief <strong>in</strong> Christianity, to f<strong>in</strong>d a sanction f'or morality <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

<strong>of</strong> evolution. The progressivist <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>of</strong> The Orig<strong>in</strong><br />

~ Species lent credence to a belief that mank<strong>in</strong>d was morally advanc<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

even if that advance was very gradual. \'lriters such as Ba<strong>in</strong>, Spencer,<br />

Lewes, and Darw<strong>in</strong> shared a common moral disourse. Their concern for<br />

moral betterment made <strong>the</strong>m emphasise cont<strong>in</strong>ually <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

sympathy as <strong>the</strong> only sure basis for <strong>in</strong>terpersonal relationships and<br />

moral growth. The capacity to feel sympathy ensured moral progress and<br />

was also an <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual. It provided<br />

a safeguard aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> "amoral <strong>in</strong>dividualism" 4 which was ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

possible <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lesson conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ~ Orig<strong>in</strong> ~ Species<br />

and <strong>the</strong> phrase "survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fittest. II But to state that <strong>George</strong><br />

<strong>Eliot</strong> believed <strong>in</strong> moral progress is not to suggest that she ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with Werbert Spencer that "progress (!a~ a beneficent necessity. II 5<br />

She early recognised that survival <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fittest did not mean survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best and accord<strong>in</strong>gly accepted a very conservative estimate<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible rate <strong>of</strong> clli~nge.<br />

The n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century empha.sis on sympathy and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term<br />

"moral sense" show a cont<strong>in</strong>uous l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> development from <strong>the</strong> moral<br />

thought <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century and such men as Shaftesbury,<br />

Hutcheson and Hume. But an emphasis on morality as primarily a feel<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!