03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fossil Fuels<br />

<strong>of</strong> seeking to reduce emissions <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases, are proposing to further increase such taxes.<br />

However, <strong>and</strong> as indicated above, the high implied carbon price <strong>of</strong> refined petroleum products<br />

(more than US$ 450/ton <strong>of</strong> CO 2 at the high end <strong>of</strong> current taxation levels) suggests that<br />

consumers will not substantially change their behavior as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> small<br />

increments to this load. Thus, while the dem<strong>and</strong> may decline somewhat from what might be<br />

anticipated, the overall volume is likely to remain quite high.<br />

4 Conclusions<br />

It is clear from the foregoing discussion that a number <strong>of</strong> questions surround the issue <strong>of</strong> how to<br />

evaluate the impact on fossil fuel exporting countries <strong>of</strong> actions to mitigate climate change.<br />

Separating climate policy actions from normal market fluctuations, <strong>and</strong> assessing the relative<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> driven changes in “with” <strong>and</strong> “without” climate action<br />

scenarios may be a difficult if not an impossible task.<br />

Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing such challenges, it also seems clear that the near term impacts <strong>of</strong> climate change<br />

<strong>mitigation</strong> policies are likely to be relatively limited for fossil fuel exporting countries based on<br />

the net effect <strong>of</strong> model results combined with the various caveats discussed in this paper.<br />

However, the longer term impacts (both from climate change <strong>mitigation</strong> policy <strong>and</strong> also from<br />

longer term energy trends) might be more significant – suggesting that countries which rely<br />

heavily on the export <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels to drive their economies may need to diversify.<br />

Whether or not effects <strong>of</strong> climate <strong>mitigation</strong> policy can be quantified, a number <strong>of</strong> actions might<br />

be taken to reduce their impacts, including:<br />

• the widest possible application <strong>of</strong> the Kyoto Protocol’s market mechanisms (emissions<br />

trading, joint implementation <strong>and</strong> CDM);<br />

• the use <strong>of</strong> other elements <strong>of</strong> flexibility (such as sinks <strong>and</strong> non-CO 2 greenhouse gases);<br />

• beginning with cost-effective policies such as subsidy removals; <strong>and</strong><br />

• promoting efforts to exchange information on ways to broaden commercial portfolios<br />

<strong>and</strong> investment strategies.<br />

It is in the long-term interest not only <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel exporters, but <strong>of</strong> importers <strong>and</strong> consumers as<br />

well, that the transition from the current carbon dioxide <strong>and</strong> greenhouse gas intensive global<br />

economy to a more sustainable, lower emission-intensity economy be as smooth as possible.<br />

Appendix I<br />

Texts <strong>of</strong> Relevant Articles from UNFCCC <strong>and</strong> Kyoto Protoco<br />

Article 4.8 <strong>and</strong> 4.9 <strong>of</strong> the UN FCCC:<br />

“4.8. In the implementation <strong>of</strong> the commitments in this Article, the Parties shall give full<br />

consideration to what actions are necessary under the Convention, including actions related to<br />

funding, insurance <strong>and</strong> the transfer <strong>of</strong> technology, to meet the specific needs <strong>and</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong><br />

developing country Parties arising from the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> climate change <strong>and</strong>/or the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> response measures, especially on:<br />

(a) Small isl<strong>and</strong> countries;<br />

(b) Countries with low-lying coastal areas;<br />

(c) Countries with arid <strong>and</strong> semi-arid areas, forested areas <strong>and</strong> areas liable to forest decay;<br />

(d) Countries with areas prone to natural disasters;<br />

(e) Countries with areas liable to drought <strong>and</strong> desertification;<br />

(f) Countries with areas <strong>of</strong> high urban atmospheric pollution;<br />

(g) Countries with areas with fragile ecosystems, including mountainous ecosystems;<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!