03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Seth Dunn<br />

year. In addition to adding unnecessary GHG emissions, this translates into an annual cost <strong>of</strong> $74<br />

billion in wasted fuel <strong>and</strong> lost productivity. Interestingly, regions that invest heavily in road<br />

construction perform no better in restricting congestion than those that invest less in roads.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> American cities are, however, starting to address development patterns that<br />

encourage automobile dependence. Their policies include regulations <strong>and</strong> incentives to lower<br />

vehicle emissions, give greater priority to bicycling <strong>and</strong> rail, <strong>and</strong> encourage developers to build<br />

on vacant l<strong>and</strong> within the city rather than in outer green regions.<br />

The U.S. city with the most progress in stemming sprawl is Portl<strong>and</strong>, Oregon. Under a 1973 state<br />

law, an urban growth boundary prevents the city from encroaching onto farm <strong>and</strong> forest l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Planners are now requiring most new building to take place within a short walk <strong>of</strong> a public transit<br />

stop. Revised zoning codes permit the mixed-use development <strong>of</strong> apartments above stores <strong>and</strong><br />

more dense types <strong>of</strong> housing - townhouses <strong>and</strong> apartment buildings - that are capable <strong>of</strong><br />

supporting public transit systems. The greater urban density that results from integrated transport<br />

planning, in addition to reducing automobile dependence <strong>and</strong> its accompanying GHG emissions,<br />

can also make for more aesthetically pleasing cities, as European cities such as Paris <strong>and</strong> Vienna<br />

demonstrate: another “local-global synergy.”<br />

4 Imposing Savings, Not Costs<br />

Opponents <strong>of</strong> public policies to address transport-related externalities <strong>of</strong>ten create the false<br />

perception that the existing system is a perfectly-operating one, <strong>and</strong> that any additional steps will<br />

therefore “impose <strong>costs</strong>.” A more accurate description, however, is that many transport systems<br />

contain substantial hidden <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> inefficiencies that, through careful policies, can be<br />

mitigated. Such steps, in fact, “impose savings” both <strong>economic</strong> <strong>and</strong> environmental, lowering<br />

energy <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> GHG emissions.<br />

A 1999 study prepared by the Tellus Institute for the World Wildlife Fund supports this<br />

alternative view. Modeling the <strong>economic</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> a package <strong>of</strong> integrated policies <strong>and</strong><br />

measures targeted at specific sectors to promote the use <strong>of</strong> high-efficiency, low-carbon<br />

technologies, the report suggests that U.S. carbon emissions can be reduced by 20 percent below<br />

1990 levels by 2010, with net annual savings <strong>of</strong> over $40 billion per year <strong>and</strong> 900,000 net<br />

additional jobs created by then. Contrary to claims that the transportation sector cannot<br />

contribute significantly to near-term reductions, all sectors make meaningful reductions in this<br />

scenario.<br />

In the 20 percent reduction scenario, the transport sector achieves carbon savings <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

200 million tons in 2010 (See Table 5). Specific steps taken in the transport sector include a<br />

vehicle efficiency initiative, with progressively stronger fuel economy st<strong>and</strong>ards for cars <strong>and</strong><br />

sport utility vehicles; R&D for improved design, materials, <strong>and</strong> technologies; public sector<br />

market creation programs for cleaner <strong>and</strong> more efficient vehicles; <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> incentives<br />

for freight trucks <strong>and</strong> other commercial modes. They also include urban <strong>and</strong> regional<br />

transportation dem<strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> other incentives: pricing reforms, such as congestion <strong>and</strong><br />

emissions-based pricing; l<strong>and</strong>-use <strong>and</strong> infrastructure planing for improved access to alternative<br />

<strong>and</strong> complementary travel modes, including transit, walking, <strong>and</strong> biking; facilitation <strong>of</strong> high<br />

speed intercity rail development; <strong>and</strong> pricing, planning, <strong>and</strong> informational initiatives to promote<br />

intermodal freight movement. Finally, they involve a cap on the carbon intensity <strong>of</strong> motor<br />

vehicles, progressively strengthened to 10 percent by 2010; R&D for renewable fuels <strong>and</strong><br />

associated vehicle technologies; <strong>and</strong> renewable fuels commercialization programs in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

market segments, including public sector procurement.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!