sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
José R. Moreira<br />
Discussion: Transport Sector GHG Emissions Control <strong>and</strong><br />
Developing Country Opportunities<br />
José R. Moreira<br />
1 Introduction<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the comprehensive analysis carried out for the transportation sector concludes that<br />
energy consumption is growing worldwide <strong>and</strong> because people have a finite time budget to spend<br />
in transportation several possible policies have only limited potential to control fuel consumption<br />
<strong>and</strong> GHG emissions. Some consequences <strong>of</strong> this framework are (Michaelis, 1996):<br />
• reducing congested traffic probably will induce further dem<strong>and</strong>;<br />
• increase in fuel price (imposed by market or through taxes) has impacts on fuel use<br />
but with an elasticity factor less than one (10% increase in fuel price yields 3.8 to<br />
8.1% reduction on fuel use);<br />
• increase in fuel economy (imposed by technological improvements) has impact on<br />
fuel use but with an elasticity factor less than one (10% increase in fuel economy<br />
yields 7.8 to 4.5% reduction in fuel consumption).<br />
2 Situation in Developed <strong>and</strong> Developing Countries (DCs)<br />
In the same way energy supply is accepted to be necessary to exp<strong>and</strong> in DCs in order to<br />
guarantee <strong>economic</strong> growth, further transportation infrastructure is needed. SAR (Climate<br />
Change, 1995) shows a strong relationship between GDP per capita <strong>and</strong> Transport Energy use<br />
per capita. Nevertheless, at a given level <strong>of</strong> GDP, energy use can vary by a factor <strong>of</strong> two. Also it<br />
is shown fuel prices may help to explain this factor <strong>of</strong> two, but other factors like geographic,<br />
cultural <strong>and</strong> other factors exist.<br />
Another useful fact pointed out in SAR is the relationship between <strong>economic</strong> influences <strong>and</strong><br />
fiscal measures.<br />
Roads in most countries are built <strong>and</strong> maintained by government <strong>and</strong> available for anyone. In<br />
principle, the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> road provision are recovered through fuel or vehicle taxes in some<br />
countries, while in others taxes are insufficient to cover the <strong>costs</strong> (see Table 1). In USA road<br />
users pay only 60% <strong>of</strong> infrastructure <strong>costs</strong> through taxes <strong>and</strong> fees (Mackenzie et al, 1992). In<br />
Europe road users pay through taxes <strong>and</strong> fees, the full cost <strong>of</strong> roads, considering that 90% <strong>of</strong> total<br />
investment in road transport is due to vehicle purchases (<strong>and</strong> taxes on its use is 10% <strong>of</strong> the car<br />
value).<br />
In DCs, where road infrastructure must be enlarged, magnitude <strong>of</strong> fiscal measures to reimburse<br />
government expenditures are poorly reported. In Brazil, for example, annual automobiles <strong>and</strong><br />
light commercial vehicles sales are around 1.4 million units (Anuário, 1999) at an average cost <strong>of</strong><br />
US$ 9,000/unit. This yields an annual sales revenue <strong>of</strong> US$ 12.6 billion/yr. In car sales, a tax <strong>of</strong><br />
18% is charged yielding US$ 2.3 billion/yr. Annual licensing is also required at a value <strong>of</strong> 3 –<br />
2% <strong>of</strong> the vehicle <strong>costs</strong>, which adds another US$ 0.3 billion from the new fleet <strong>and</strong> more from<br />
191