03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Renewable Energy<br />

Table 7<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> target <strong>and</strong> reference scenarios<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> target <strong>and</strong> reference scenarios<br />

(2030) World Investment <strong>costs</strong> Capacity<br />

installed<br />

Electricity<br />

Production<br />

Cumulative<br />

Investment<br />

Advanced Thermodynamic Cycle 13.6% -58.4% -56.1% -50.8%<br />

Super Critical Coal 18.6% -70.2% -68.2% -64.2%<br />

Integrated Coal Gasif. Comb. Cycle 7.9% -45.7% -48.7% -40.7%<br />

Coal Conventional Thermal * 0.0% -42.3% -52.2%<br />

Lignite Conventional Thermal * 0.0% -81.3% -85.1%<br />

Large Hydro * 0.0% 4.0% 3.4%<br />

Nuclear LWR * 0.0% 44.8% 44.7%<br />

New Nuclear Design -7.3% 239.2% 236.4% 216.0%<br />

Gas Conventional Thermal * 0.0% -13.8% -4.6%<br />

Gas Turbines Combined Cycle 1.5% -4.5% 8.0% -1.7%<br />

Oil Conventional Thermal * 0.0% -22.1% -38.3%<br />

Oil Fired Gas Turbines 2.0% -50.0% -32.4% -53.5%<br />

Waste Incineration CHP * 0.0% 109.2% 109.2% 165.0%<br />

Biomass Gasif. with Gas Turbines -24.3% 221.0% 221.0% 197.3%<br />

Combined Heat <strong>and</strong> Power -9.3% 66.0% 66.0% 60.6%<br />

Photovoltaics (windows) -28.1% 416.9% 416.9% 229.3%<br />

Proton Exch. Membr. Fuel Cell (Fixed) -4.1% 38.6% 38.6% 32.0%<br />

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (Fixed Cogen.) 0.0% 34.1% 34.1% 37.8%<br />

Rural Photovoltaics * 0.0% 142.0% 142.0% 166.5%<br />

Solar Thermal -15.6% 367.3% 367.3% 346.2%<br />

Small Hydro -5.5% 58.9% 58.9% 141.0%<br />

Wind -36.3% 1450.2% 1249.7% 858.0%<br />

* Exogenous Technical Change<br />

The key results <strong>of</strong> the “Kyoto II” scenario with endogenous technology can thus be highlighted<br />

as follows:<br />

- investment <strong>costs</strong> for non-fossil fuel technologies are markedly lower <strong>and</strong> conversely<br />

investment <strong>costs</strong> for clean coal technologies display notably higher values; this is due both to<br />

the re-direction <strong>of</strong> R&D activity <strong>and</strong> the learning by doing effects; in general the synergy <strong>of</strong><br />

carbon values affecting variable <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> the endogenous impacts on fixed <strong>costs</strong> introduce a<br />

powerful new flexibility to the power generating sector in dealing with carbon dioxide<br />

emission restrictions;<br />

- installed capacity by 2030 reflects the carbon intensity <strong>and</strong> the fixed <strong>costs</strong> such as they are<br />

discussed in the previous paragraph; otherwise the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the impact depends on the<br />

growth that the technology experienced in the reference case: supercritical coal is most<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!