03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Renewable Energy<br />

the contrary, cumulative research for photovoltaic increases regularly throughout the period as do<br />

biomass <strong>and</strong> wind research, with lower levels <strong>of</strong> cumulative R&D.<br />

Figure 10 Cumulative PERD, renewable technologies (10 6 $90)<br />

4 500<br />

4 000<br />

3 500<br />

3 000<br />

BIOMASS<br />

SOL PV<br />

SOL POWER<br />

SOL HEAT<br />

WIND<br />

2 500<br />

2 000<br />

1 500<br />

1 000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

1973<br />

1974<br />

1975<br />

1976<br />

1977<br />

1978<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1982<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

Figure 11 “Stock to Flow” ratio for PERD, key technologies<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1974<br />

1975<br />

BREEDER<br />

FUSION<br />

LWR<br />

BIOMASS<br />

SOL PV<br />

SOL THERM<br />

WIND<br />

1976<br />

1977<br />

1978<br />

1979<br />

1980<br />

1981<br />

1982<br />

1983<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

R&D stock-to-flow ratios <strong>and</strong> the maturity <strong>of</strong> technologies<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

The ratio <strong>of</strong> past cumulative R&D to current R&D flow can be defined as a “ R&D stock-to-flow<br />

ratio”. It measures the number <strong>of</strong> years that are necessary for a doubling <strong>of</strong> cumulative research,<br />

if the annual budget is supposed constant. The lower this ratio is, the higher the incremental rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> increase in cumulative research, <strong>and</strong> conversely. In some sense this ratio provides an indicator<br />

<strong>of</strong> the speed in the renewal <strong>of</strong> technological knowledge. In the process <strong>of</strong> R&D programs<br />

development, the stock-to-flow ratio is low for a new technology <strong>and</strong> then increases if the annual<br />

spending is not increasing; a mature technology will thus probably show a high R&D stock-t<strong>of</strong>low<br />

ratio, corresponding to a lower rate <strong>of</strong> increase in knowledge.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!