sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Renewable Energy<br />
• There is aesthetic opposition to winduse because <strong>of</strong> noise while in operation <strong>and</strong> location<br />
<strong>of</strong> turbines. However, turbines can be located in rural areas, with surrounding l<strong>and</strong> used<br />
for agriculture or other purposes.<br />
• Birds are attracted to the whirring noises made by the turbines; in some areas bird<br />
mortality rates have increased significantly in some instances affecting endangered bird<br />
species.<br />
• Resources are site-specific <strong>and</strong> may not be located close to dem<strong>and</strong> centers.<br />
• Wind is intermittent; if not grid connected, a source <strong>of</strong> back-up power is needed,<br />
increasing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> generation.<br />
Climate Change Impact<br />
Conditions for Emissions Mitigation:<br />
• If wind potential reaches the projected 700-1,000 TWh worldwide by 2020, it would avoid<br />
the production <strong>of</strong> 0.1-0.2 GtC/year <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel-fired electricity.<br />
Emission estimate: 1 kWh <strong>of</strong> wind avoids 0.5-1.0 kg/CO 2<br />
A wind turbine with a 500-kW capacity operating at 30%<br />
availability <strong>and</strong> producing 1.3 MWh per year avoids 351<br />
MtC/year.<br />
Cost-effectiveness:<br />
Secondary effects:<br />
3 Impact Assessment<br />
$21.53 ton/C<br />
Produces no air pollutants or greenhouse gases. Wind generation<br />
avoids up to 7 grams/kWh <strong>of</strong> SO 2 , NOx <strong>and</strong> particulates from the<br />
coal fuel cycle (including Mining <strong>and</strong> transport); 0.1 g/kWh <strong>of</strong><br />
trace metals (including mercury); <strong>and</strong> more than 200 g/kWh <strong>of</strong><br />
solid wasters from coal tailings <strong>and</strong> ash.<br />
Numerous Barriers to the use <strong>of</strong> renewable energy (RE)<br />
Numerous barriers still constrain potential RE markets. While markets are starting to develop in<br />
many countries, RE use still faces substantial constraints. Barriers include: lack <strong>of</strong> information<br />
about RE technology <strong>and</strong> grid extension plans; lack <strong>of</strong> capital for RE businesses <strong>and</strong> consumer<br />
financing programs; <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> trained technicians, managers <strong>and</strong> other human infrastructure<br />
needed for system delivery <strong>and</strong> maintenance. Market distortions stemming from import duties on<br />
RE equipment <strong>and</strong> subsidies for kerosene also constrain RE dissemination in many countries.<br />
International initiatives <strong>and</strong> host country policies can help to remove these barriers, accelerate<br />
RES markets, <strong>and</strong> ensure that potential GHG <strong>mitigation</strong> <strong>and</strong> development <strong>benefits</strong> are<br />
realizeable.<br />
High rate <strong>of</strong> CO 2 displacement<br />
RE has a high rate <strong>of</strong> CO 2 displacement per installed Wp. Due to the tremendous inefficiency <strong>of</strong><br />
kerosene lighting, rural house-hold electrification in developing countries is among the highest<br />
with PV applications for climate change <strong>mitigation</strong> per installed Wp. Displacing kerosene lamps<br />
typically reduces far more CO 2 per installed Wp than grid-connected PV applications, in some<br />
cases by a factor <strong>of</strong> ten.<br />
Social, <strong>economic</strong>, <strong>and</strong> non-GHG environmental <strong>benefits</strong><br />
152