sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Patrick Criqui, Nikos Kouvaritakis <strong>and</strong> Leo Schrattenholzer<br />
3 Integrating the impacts <strong>of</strong> R&D <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> learning by doing in a world energy<br />
modelling framework<br />
The abundant literature on the sources <strong>and</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> technological change suggest that the<br />
process is always uncertain <strong>and</strong> shows important stochastic features. However, inducement<br />
factors such as price signals <strong>and</strong> technological imbalances in the “dem<strong>and</strong>-pull” perspective<br />
(Schmookler, 1966), R&D programmes <strong>and</strong> factor availability in the “supply-push” approach<br />
(Rosenberg, 1976) can be identified as playing an important role in technology development.<br />
Last but not least, endogenous mechanisms based on the development <strong>of</strong> technological<br />
“trajectories” (Dosi, 1982), with the accumulation <strong>of</strong> experience through “learning by doing”<br />
processes described above also explain the improvements in the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> performances <strong>of</strong><br />
technologies (Arrow, 1962), as they progressively diffuse from “niche markets” to large scale<br />
applications.<br />
3.1. A modelling scheme for a partial endogenisation <strong>of</strong> technology in energy models<br />
The POLES model is a global <strong>sectoral</strong> model <strong>of</strong> the world energy system. It has been developed<br />
in the framework <strong>of</strong> a hierarchical structure <strong>of</strong> interconnected sub-models at the international,<br />
regional <strong>and</strong> national levels (for a detailed description <strong>of</strong> the model see Criqui et al., 1996). The<br />
dynamics <strong>of</strong> the model is based on a recursive (year-by-year) simulation process <strong>of</strong> energy<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply, with lagged adjustments to prices <strong>and</strong> a feedback loop through endogenous<br />
international energy prices. The price mechanisms, which are pervasive in the model, allow to<br />
consistently study the impacts <strong>of</strong> environmental policies based on the principle <strong>of</strong> internalisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> environmental <strong>costs</strong>, while the level <strong>of</strong> detail in the description <strong>of</strong> energy technologies allows<br />
to identify the impact <strong>of</strong> changes in the technologies’ performances <strong>and</strong> <strong>costs</strong>.<br />
As an attempt to provide more detail in the description <strong>of</strong> these mechanisms, modelling efforts<br />
have recently been performed in order to develop a module for the endogenisation <strong>of</strong> technical<br />
change in energy models. The basic structure <strong>of</strong> this module is described in Diagram 2, showing<br />
the integration <strong>of</strong> four main sets <strong>of</strong> variables / modelling mechanisms: i. the exogenous public<br />
policy variables which give the impulse / constraints to the whole system, ii. the endogenous<br />
industry R&D investment module, iii. the “two factor learning curve”, which provides the<br />
dynamics for technology improvement, <strong>and</strong> iv. the main POLES model, as a technology<br />
diffusion model. Each <strong>of</strong> these components is described below.<br />
3.2. The exogenous policy variables: public energy R&D <strong>and</strong> price signals<br />
This first component in the system remains exogenous as it represents the key elements <strong>of</strong> public<br />
policies, the endogenisation <strong>of</strong> which would make no sense as the proper goal <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
modelling exercises is precisely to investigate <strong>and</strong> assess the consequences <strong>of</strong> the different policy<br />
options. Two sets <strong>of</strong> variables or constraints are to be taken into account: on one h<strong>and</strong> the volume<br />
<strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> public energy R&D <strong>and</strong> on the other h<strong>and</strong> the constraints concerning the<br />
environment <strong>and</strong> expressed either in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental taxes or emission targets <strong>and</strong><br />
corresponding “carbon value”.<br />
The first set <strong>of</strong> variables clearly corresponds to the “technology-push” approach, through public<br />
R&D programmes. They will have an impact on a more or less important part <strong>of</strong> the accumulated<br />
knowledge, according to the technology considered. This variable will have in turn an impact on<br />
the current <strong>and</strong> expected cost <strong>and</strong> performances <strong>of</strong> each technology.<br />
The second set <strong>of</strong> variable represents “dem<strong>and</strong>-pull” inducement factors, as they allow to<br />
introduce in the model social <strong>and</strong> environmental targets, through the system <strong>of</strong> “shadow<br />
environmental taxes” or “emission trading systems”. In that way, they will be a powerful means<br />
in order to stimulate technological change towards more environmentally compatible solutions.<br />
119