03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Patrick Criqui, Nikos Kouvaritakis <strong>and</strong> Leo Schrattenholzer<br />

3 Integrating the impacts <strong>of</strong> R&D <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> learning by doing in a world energy<br />

modelling framework<br />

The abundant literature on the sources <strong>and</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> technological change suggest that the<br />

process is always uncertain <strong>and</strong> shows important stochastic features. However, inducement<br />

factors such as price signals <strong>and</strong> technological imbalances in the “dem<strong>and</strong>-pull” perspective<br />

(Schmookler, 1966), R&D programmes <strong>and</strong> factor availability in the “supply-push” approach<br />

(Rosenberg, 1976) can be identified as playing an important role in technology development.<br />

Last but not least, endogenous mechanisms based on the development <strong>of</strong> technological<br />

“trajectories” (Dosi, 1982), with the accumulation <strong>of</strong> experience through “learning by doing”<br />

processes described above also explain the improvements in the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> performances <strong>of</strong><br />

technologies (Arrow, 1962), as they progressively diffuse from “niche markets” to large scale<br />

applications.<br />

3.1. A modelling scheme for a partial endogenisation <strong>of</strong> technology in energy models<br />

The POLES model is a global <strong>sectoral</strong> model <strong>of</strong> the world energy system. It has been developed<br />

in the framework <strong>of</strong> a hierarchical structure <strong>of</strong> interconnected sub-models at the international,<br />

regional <strong>and</strong> national levels (for a detailed description <strong>of</strong> the model see Criqui et al., 1996). The<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> the model is based on a recursive (year-by-year) simulation process <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply, with lagged adjustments to prices <strong>and</strong> a feedback loop through endogenous<br />

international energy prices. The price mechanisms, which are pervasive in the model, allow to<br />

consistently study the impacts <strong>of</strong> environmental policies based on the principle <strong>of</strong> internalisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental <strong>costs</strong>, while the level <strong>of</strong> detail in the description <strong>of</strong> energy technologies allows<br />

to identify the impact <strong>of</strong> changes in the technologies’ performances <strong>and</strong> <strong>costs</strong>.<br />

As an attempt to provide more detail in the description <strong>of</strong> these mechanisms, modelling efforts<br />

have recently been performed in order to develop a module for the endogenisation <strong>of</strong> technical<br />

change in energy models. The basic structure <strong>of</strong> this module is described in Diagram 2, showing<br />

the integration <strong>of</strong> four main sets <strong>of</strong> variables / modelling mechanisms: i. the exogenous public<br />

policy variables which give the impulse / constraints to the whole system, ii. the endogenous<br />

industry R&D investment module, iii. the “two factor learning curve”, which provides the<br />

dynamics for technology improvement, <strong>and</strong> iv. the main POLES model, as a technology<br />

diffusion model. Each <strong>of</strong> these components is described below.<br />

3.2. The exogenous policy variables: public energy R&D <strong>and</strong> price signals<br />

This first component in the system remains exogenous as it represents the key elements <strong>of</strong> public<br />

policies, the endogenisation <strong>of</strong> which would make no sense as the proper goal <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

modelling exercises is precisely to investigate <strong>and</strong> assess the consequences <strong>of</strong> the different policy<br />

options. Two sets <strong>of</strong> variables or constraints are to be taken into account: on one h<strong>and</strong> the volume<br />

<strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> public energy R&D <strong>and</strong> on the other h<strong>and</strong> the constraints concerning the<br />

environment <strong>and</strong> expressed either in terms <strong>of</strong> environmental taxes or emission targets <strong>and</strong><br />

corresponding “carbon value”.<br />

The first set <strong>of</strong> variables clearly corresponds to the “technology-push” approach, through public<br />

R&D programmes. They will have an impact on a more or less important part <strong>of</strong> the accumulated<br />

knowledge, according to the technology considered. This variable will have in turn an impact on<br />

the current <strong>and</strong> expected cost <strong>and</strong> performances <strong>of</strong> each technology.<br />

The second set <strong>of</strong> variable represents “dem<strong>and</strong>-pull” inducement factors, as they allow to<br />

introduce in the model social <strong>and</strong> environmental targets, through the system <strong>of</strong> “shadow<br />

environmental taxes” or “emission trading systems”. In that way, they will be a powerful means<br />

in order to stimulate technological change towards more environmentally compatible solutions.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!