03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gina Roos<br />

emissions 6.5% to this. Under the <strong>IPCC</strong> methodology, the total energy sector contributed 89% <strong>of</strong><br />

the total CO 2 equivalent emissions. Further breakdowns <strong>of</strong> contributions in the energy sector are<br />

given in Table 1 below.<br />

Table 1 Contributions to CO 2 equivalent Emissions from the Energy Sector in 1990<br />

Sector<br />

Contribution<br />

Electricity production 37.7%<br />

Agriculture 11.3%<br />

Fugitive 9.9%<br />

Transport 9.3%<br />

Heat production 8.8%<br />

Manufacturing & Other 14%<br />

Industrial processes 6.6%<br />

Waste 2.4%<br />

Source: van der Merwe <strong>and</strong> Scholes (1999)<br />

Enteric fermentation <strong>and</strong> manure h<strong>and</strong>ling were the major contributors to CH 4 emissions, while<br />

fertilisers, manure h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> burning <strong>of</strong> rangel<strong>and</strong>s contributed the majority <strong>of</strong> N 2 O<br />

emissions.<br />

Industrial Energy Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

According to the South African National Energy Association (SANEA), industry had 62% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

energy market share in 1996, followed by transport 21%, residential 10%, commerce ad services,<br />

4% <strong>and</strong> agriculture 3%. The total energy carrier market share was split between oil products<br />

32%, coal 28%, electricity 22%, combustible renewables 16% <strong>and</strong> gas 1% (SANEA, 1998). Of<br />

the 62% <strong>of</strong> energy consumed by industry <strong>and</strong> mining, coal contributed 53%, electricity 32% <strong>and</strong><br />

liquid fuels 13%. Of the electricity produced in 1996, 91.4% was supplied by coal-fired power<br />

stations.<br />

Further it was highlighted that South Africa is relatively energy intensive compared with other<br />

developing countries. This was attributed to the following:<br />

• the large primary minerals’ extraction <strong>and</strong> beneficiary sector;<br />

• huge <strong>and</strong> accessible coal resources;<br />

• a synthetic fuels industry which is based on coal <strong>and</strong> natural gas as opposed to crude oil;<br />

• low energy prices;<br />

• a relatively low level <strong>of</strong> energy efficiency.<br />

The government’s stated intention after the 1994 elections was to encourage development <strong>of</strong><br />

downstream industries with a focus on labour intensity <strong>and</strong> value-added.<br />

Despite having a high energy intensity compared with other developing countries, South African<br />

industries exhibit energy intensities similar to those <strong>of</strong> other developing countries, between 15 –<br />

50% higher than those <strong>of</strong> industrialised countries (SANEA, 1998). This is consistent with<br />

previously derived energy development curves whereby energy intensity <strong>and</strong> consumption both<br />

increase to a peak, after which although energy consumption continues to increase, energy<br />

consumption per unit <strong>of</strong> GDP improves. SANEA (1998) report that a 10- 20% energy saving<br />

through improved energy efficiency could lead to an effective increase <strong>of</strong> 1.5 – 3% in gross<br />

domestic product (GDP) within the time frame <strong>of</strong> such savings. This study will be re-examined<br />

in the course <strong>of</strong> the Mitigation component <strong>of</strong> the South African Country Study.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!