sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Seth Dunn <strong>and</strong> Michael Renner<br />
Figure 4. U.S. Coal Mining, Output <strong>and</strong> Jobs, 1958-98<br />
300<br />
Source: DOE, Dept. <strong>of</strong> Labor<br />
1200<br />
250<br />
1000<br />
Th<br />
ou<br />
sa<br />
nd<br />
s<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Jo<br />
bs<br />
200<br />
150<br />
800<br />
600<br />
Mil<br />
lio<br />
ns<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Sh<br />
ort<br />
To<br />
ns<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Co<br />
al<br />
Jobs<br />
Output<br />
100<br />
400<br />
50<br />
200<br />
0<br />
1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998<br />
0<br />
4 Reducing Emissions, Increasing Employment<br />
One obstacle to implementing climate policy has been the opposition <strong>of</strong> labor unions concerned<br />
about potential membership losses. The AFL-CIO Executive Council, for example, issued a<br />
statement in February 1999 reaffirming its position to the Kyoto Protocol, arguing that it “could<br />
have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy <strong>and</strong> American workers.” But even in the absence<br />
<strong>of</strong> climate policy, the number <strong>of</strong> jobs in many <strong>of</strong> these industries is already declining, <strong>of</strong>ten even<br />
as output continues to rise. Avoiding or postponing an environmental policy will do little to save<br />
these jobs; workers may be better served by participating constructively in climate <strong>mitigation</strong><br />
debates.<br />
The coal sector is a case in point, although similar stories could be told about oil refining,<br />
utilities, <strong>and</strong> energy-intensive industries such as primary metals <strong>and</strong> steel. Around the world, the<br />
coal industry’s shrinking pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>and</strong> growing deficits are leading to cost-cutting practices that<br />
translate into lower prices but also fewer jobs. This trend could well continue: world coal<br />
consumption has fallen 5.3 percent since 1997, <strong>and</strong> is now at its lowest point since 1987. (See<br />
Figure 3.)<br />
Like other sunset industries, the coal sector is increasingly characterized by bigger <strong>and</strong> fewer<br />
companies, larger equipment, <strong>and</strong> less labor-intensive operations. Worldwide, it is estimated that<br />
only about 10 million jobs remain, accounting for just one third <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the global work<br />
force. In the United States, coal production increased 35 percent between 1980 <strong>and</strong> 1998, but<br />
coal mining employment declined 63 percent, from 242,000 to 90,000 workers. (See Figure 4.)<br />
In Europe, jobs in this field have dropped even more, since production is falling substantially. In<br />
Germany, productivity gains <strong>and</strong> rising coal imports are projected to cut employment from<br />
265,000 in 1991 to less than 80,000 by 2020. British coal production has fallen to less than half<br />
its 1980 level, <strong>and</strong> employment has dropped from 224,000 to just 10,000 miners. In South Africa,<br />
79