03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Somnath Bhattacharjee<br />

Costs <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> CO 2 <strong>mitigation</strong><br />

An assessment <strong>of</strong> various energy saving options was carried out that would lead to substantial<br />

reduction in CO 2 emissions. Table 4 gives a list <strong>of</strong> such measures along with the corresponding<br />

<strong>benefits</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> energy savings <strong>and</strong> CO 2 reduction. The cost <strong>of</strong> implementing the measures is<br />

also presented alongwith.<br />

As can be seen from table 4, the total energy savings that would accrue by implementing all the<br />

listed measures is 61.33 PJ, which is 20.9% <strong>of</strong> the total primary energy use in the sector. The<br />

reduction in CO 2 emissions will be 6 million tonnes, which is 10.3% <strong>of</strong> the total CO 2 emission by<br />

the industry in 1995.<br />

Table 4<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> measures on energy saving <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emission<br />

Option<br />

Specific<br />

<strong>costs</strong><br />

Energy<br />

savings<br />

CO 2<br />

avoided<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

avoided<br />

Adjustable speed drives -1.83 7.63 776.05 -17.99<br />

High efficiency motors <strong>and</strong> -5.59 7.77 485.03 -54.97<br />

drives<br />

New preheater with precalcination<br />

-2.35 2.20 208.01 -24.35<br />

New cyclone preheaters -2.21 5.84 561.80 -22.97<br />

VRMs in raw, coal, cement 17.92 6.62 672.96 176.28<br />

mills<br />

Roller press as pre-grinder 9.19 5.50 558.76 90.45<br />

Mineralisers 2.89 10.05 950.41 30.55<br />

6 stage suspension preheater -0.20 2.25 213.20 -2.11<br />

New burners, dual firing -0.91 2.71 256.80 -9.60<br />

system<br />

Grate cooler modification -1.51 10.32 975.84 -15.96<br />

Closed circuit milling -3.75 3.44 349.22 -36.93<br />

Total 61.33 6008.08<br />

Case study III Small-scale cast iron foundry industry<br />

The iron foundry industry based on cupola furnaces comprises <strong>of</strong> units that are largely under the<br />

small-scale sector. These units are in existence for very long <strong>and</strong> have some specific advantages<br />

that most certainly ensure that they will continue to melt by far the largest production <strong>of</strong> grey<br />

iron in future. There are more than 6000 such foundry units <strong>and</strong> these are located mostly in<br />

clusters. At a given location, there are a large number <strong>of</strong> similar units with the size <strong>of</strong> the cluster<br />

varying from around 100 units to as large as 400 units. There are a lot <strong>of</strong> commonality between<br />

the units within a cluster in terms <strong>of</strong> technology level, operating practices, type <strong>of</strong> product, trade<br />

practices, etc. The castings produced by these units are mostly low grade, low value items like<br />

pipe fittings, sanitary ware, road furniture etc. The units are not pr<strong>of</strong>essionally managed, <strong>and</strong><br />

very little investment has gone into the sector towards up gradation/modernisation <strong>of</strong> facilities.<br />

Energy performance<br />

Coke is the major source <strong>of</strong> energy used by the industry to melt down the metallics <strong>and</strong> other raw<br />

materials in the cupola furnace. The sector consumes an estimated 0.8 million tonnes <strong>of</strong> coke per<br />

annum. The operating efficiency <strong>of</strong> the furnaces is extremely low owing to a multitude <strong>of</strong> reasons<br />

that range from improper design <strong>of</strong> furnaces, poor operating practices, poor coke quality etc.<br />

Charge coke percentage, which is an index <strong>of</strong> furnace efficiency ranges from a low <strong>of</strong> around<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!