03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transport<br />

The first category has long been pursued with ups <strong>and</strong> downs. Several developed countries have<br />

issued regulations or voluntary agreement <strong>and</strong> some results are presented in Figure 3 for<br />

automobiles <strong>and</strong> in Figure 4 for high duty vehicles. As noted, with exception <strong>of</strong> the USA, where<br />

space for technical advances were greater, fuel efficiency improvement was below 20% in the<br />

last 20 years.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the reasons for such modest result is the cost <strong>of</strong> energy intensity improvements. Figure 5<br />

shows some <strong>of</strong> the available information relating energy intensity reduction with car cost<br />

increase. As noted, even with promising technologies still under development a 50% reduction<br />

on energy intensity will increase car cost by 12%. A much easier to sell idea to decision makers<br />

that is based in current commercial technologies shows that 20% energy intensity reduction is the<br />

maximum which can be performed based in a 12% increase in car cost.<br />

An energy intensity improvement <strong>of</strong> around 1.5% /yr (which will achieve 20% in 12 years) is<br />

shown in Figure 6. In this scenario, 40% traffic rebound effect due to reduction in the fuel budget<br />

<strong>of</strong> drivers is assumed.<br />

Institutional <strong>and</strong> <strong>economic</strong> measures have modest to medium potential for achieving C emission<br />

reduction. Full budgetary cost pricing has impacts lower than 10% (Figure 1). Adding<br />

externalities can impact as much as 30% in OECD countries (see Figure 2), but this has huge<br />

impact on fuel price as shown in Table 3.<br />

5.1 Fuel Change<br />

Fuel change has a large opportunity in abating C emission. One <strong>of</strong> the fuels used extensively to<br />

satisfy emission st<strong>and</strong>ards in USA is Reformulated Gasoline (RFG). We plan to base the<br />

following discussion using RFG as the baseline.<br />

Ethanol <strong>and</strong> vegetable oils at this moment are the only commercial renewable fuels being used.<br />

Ethanol production as a fuel is around 20 billion liters per year <strong>and</strong> the major producers are<br />

Brazil <strong>and</strong> the United States. Each country uses different routes for the production <strong>of</strong> ethanol. In<br />

USA, as in all other temperate countries, ethanol used as a fuel is obtained from corn, wheat,<br />

potatoes, while in tropical countries it is derived from sugarcane.<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!