03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fossil Fuels<br />

expensive to move <strong>and</strong> to store, only about 14.5 percent <strong>of</strong> the world’s coal production is sold in<br />

an international market. Thus, the world’s coal industry is dominated by production for local use<br />

– although local performance is increasingly being assessed against the performance st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

required in the international market 1 .<br />

According to recent IEA analyses, the power generation sector would be extremely sensitive to<br />

any increase in the CO 2 price <strong>of</strong> its fuel – reacting by shifting away from high CO 2 content coal –<br />

first to natural gas (or possibly even oil), <strong>and</strong> ultimately to non-CO 2 sources such as nuclear<br />

power <strong>and</strong> renewables. Such sensitivity suggest that even small increases in price would bring<br />

significant shifts away from coal – although care must be taken not to underestimate the ability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the coal industry to respond to price signals <strong>and</strong> lower <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> production (<strong>and</strong> transport) to<br />

remain competitive. In addition, care must be taken not to assume shifting away from coal will<br />

necessarily occur immediately: pricing, availability <strong>of</strong> alternatives <strong>and</strong> market inertia will dictate<br />

how rapidly any change might happen.<br />

Currently, the world’s five largest exporters account for approximately 70% <strong>of</strong> world coal<br />

exports; the top ten account for 93% percent. Table 3 makes clear, however, that the largest<br />

exporters (the US <strong>and</strong> Australia), each <strong>of</strong> which supply a substantial share <strong>of</strong> their exports to<br />

OECD countries, are likely to feel the heaviest losses.<br />

Table 3<br />

Coal Exports <strong>of</strong> Top Ten Coal Exporting Countries<br />

Country<br />

R/P ratio<br />

Total Exports<br />

% to non<br />

% to OECD<br />

(thous<strong>and</strong> tons)<br />

OECD<br />

1. Australia 412.9 162,298 77.7% 22.3 %<br />

2. USA 263.5 70,510 80.3 % 19.7 %<br />

3. South Africa 248.4 67,103 68.2 % 31.8 %<br />

4. Indonesia 87.4 46,913 48.7 % 51.3 %<br />

5. Canada 225.1 34,179 87.0 % 13.0 %<br />

6. China 92.7 32,289 71.9 % 28.1 %<br />

7. Colombia 200 29,571 70.8 % 29.2 %<br />

8. Pol<strong>and</strong> 122.4 28,055 85.6 % 14.4 %<br />

9. Kazakhstan 507 ~25,000 0 % 100 %<br />

10. Russia 1056 23,478 63.6 % 36.4 %<br />

TOTAL TOP 10 240 519,000 70.3 % 29.7 %<br />

Source : IEA databases.<br />

Of the two top-five non-Annex I Parties, Indonesia seems likely to <strong>of</strong>fset losses in its potential<br />

exports through its own internal growth: between 1980 <strong>and</strong> 1996, Indonesia’s domestic<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> coal was growing at 28 percent per year 2 . Furthermore, approximately half <strong>of</strong> its<br />

exports are sent to non-Annex I Parties – exports which could in theory continue as these<br />

countries do not have binding emissions reductions obligations. South Africa’s internal growth is<br />

not as rapid, <strong>and</strong> it exports only approximately one third <strong>of</strong> its total to non-Annex I Parties. It<br />

seems likely that <strong>of</strong> the major non-Annex I coal exporting countries, South Africa could feel the<br />

greatest impact.<br />

The market price for coal varies depending on the grade <strong>of</strong> the coal; it is currently approximately<br />

$45 per ton for steam coal. Assuming that coal prices decline by as much as 30% as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

1 IEA “Coal Information 1998” published 1999. Note that internationally traded coal has traditionally been<br />

restricted to higher quality coals <strong>and</strong> coal that has been cleaned <strong>and</strong> processed to a higher extent than<br />

locally burnt coal – to maximize energy content with respect to the high transport <strong>costs</strong>.<br />

2 Note: Indonesian growth declined precipitously in 1997 with the Asian region’s <strong>economic</strong> collapse;<br />

depending on how rapidly the economy picks up, domestic capacity may take longer to absorb any decline<br />

in exports.<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!