sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Renewable Energy<br />
4 Impacts <strong>of</strong> carbon constraints on power generation <strong>and</strong> renewable energy<br />
technologies<br />
A Reference Case, produced with the POLES model, provides a picture <strong>of</strong> the energy system to<br />
2030 for a world with no emission constraints. In spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that international commitments<br />
have been decided in Kyoto <strong>and</strong> should thus be part <strong>of</strong> the Reference, this “No Policy” case is<br />
indeed essential for the assessment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> emission control policies. The concept <strong>of</strong><br />
“Business as Usual projection” or “Reference Case” has been very much criticised as<br />
representing a too narrow-minded <strong>and</strong> mechanistic approach to forecasting. It should obviously<br />
be understood that the Reference Case presented hereafter, instead <strong>of</strong> proposing a narrow vision<br />
<strong>of</strong> possible futures, on the contrary provides a benchmark for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> very contrasted<br />
alternative policy cases. In the first sub-section we present the main features <strong>of</strong> the Reference<br />
Case to 2030, the corresponding trends in power generation technologies <strong>and</strong> the CO 2 Constraint<br />
Case. The second sub-section is the final point <strong>of</strong> the research <strong>and</strong> examines the impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
CO 2 Constraint Case for power generation <strong>and</strong> renewable technologies in a perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
endogenous technical change.<br />
4.1. The world energy system in 2030<br />
Every POLES’ model simulation is built on three main sets <strong>of</strong> exogenous hypotheses, which are<br />
introduced on a region by region basis: i. population, ii. GDP growth <strong>and</strong> iii. oil <strong>and</strong> gas resource<br />
endowment. In the Reference Case the corresponding hypotheses are the following:<br />
- the world population increases to 8.7 billion persons in 2030, in line with most other longterm<br />
energy outlooks (Nakicenovic et al., 1998);<br />
- a rapid recovery <strong>of</strong> the world economy from the 1997-1998 crisis is assumed <strong>and</strong> World<br />
GDP is expected to rise at a sustained 3.3 % pa between 2000 <strong>and</strong> 2030; this corresponds to<br />
an increase <strong>of</strong> 2.1 % pa in average per capita GDP, with a lower increase in the OECD<br />
countries <strong>and</strong> some “catching-up” <strong>of</strong> the emerging regions <strong>of</strong> the world;<br />
- finally, oil <strong>and</strong> gas resource endowment is based on the USGS’ “mode” estimates (Masters et<br />
al., 1994), which amounts to 2 400 Gbl for oil Ultimate Recoverable Resources in 1990,<br />
while rising recovery rates in the model substantially increases future recoverable resources.<br />
Key features <strong>of</strong> the energy system in 2030<br />
These key hypotheses <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the Reference Case in terms <strong>of</strong> primary energy<br />
consumption <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emissions are summarised below in Table 7. According to this scenario<br />
<strong>and</strong> in spite <strong>of</strong> a marked trend to increased energy efficiency (+1.1 % pa until 2030), world<br />
energy consumption will increase by 2.2 % pa <strong>and</strong> almost double between now <strong>and</strong> 2030. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> the increase comes from developing regions as the growth in energy consumption is only <strong>of</strong><br />
0.8 % pa in the OECD region.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> primary source this case, which as already noted does not incorporate any CO 2<br />
constraint, implies significant increases in fossil fuel consumption. Coal consumption is strongly<br />
stimulated by rising energy dem<strong>and</strong> in China <strong>and</strong> India <strong>and</strong> experience the highest growth rate,<br />
followed by natural gas <strong>and</strong> then by oil. As for the non fossil fuel options, their share in world<br />
energy supply is decreasing as the growth <strong>of</strong> nuclear energy is very low <strong>and</strong> as renewables grow<br />
quickly but from very low initial levels.<br />
From these results, it thus appears that the secular trend <strong>of</strong> “decarbonisation” (Grübler <strong>and</strong><br />
Nakicenovic 1996) may experience some reversal in the next three decades. CO 2 emissions<br />
indeed increase more rapidly than total energy consumption: total CO 2 emissions rise to 8.2 GtC<br />
in 2010 <strong>and</strong> 13.4 GtC in 2030 from the 5.9 GtC level in 1990.<br />
124