03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Renewable Energy<br />

4 Impacts <strong>of</strong> carbon constraints on power generation <strong>and</strong> renewable energy<br />

technologies<br />

A Reference Case, produced with the POLES model, provides a picture <strong>of</strong> the energy system to<br />

2030 for a world with no emission constraints. In spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that international commitments<br />

have been decided in Kyoto <strong>and</strong> should thus be part <strong>of</strong> the Reference, this “No Policy” case is<br />

indeed essential for the assessment <strong>of</strong> the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> emission control policies. The concept <strong>of</strong><br />

“Business as Usual projection” or “Reference Case” has been very much criticised as<br />

representing a too narrow-minded <strong>and</strong> mechanistic approach to forecasting. It should obviously<br />

be understood that the Reference Case presented hereafter, instead <strong>of</strong> proposing a narrow vision<br />

<strong>of</strong> possible futures, on the contrary provides a benchmark for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> very contrasted<br />

alternative policy cases. In the first sub-section we present the main features <strong>of</strong> the Reference<br />

Case to 2030, the corresponding trends in power generation technologies <strong>and</strong> the CO 2 Constraint<br />

Case. The second sub-section is the final point <strong>of</strong> the research <strong>and</strong> examines the impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CO 2 Constraint Case for power generation <strong>and</strong> renewable technologies in a perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

endogenous technical change.<br />

4.1. The world energy system in 2030<br />

Every POLES’ model simulation is built on three main sets <strong>of</strong> exogenous hypotheses, which are<br />

introduced on a region by region basis: i. population, ii. GDP growth <strong>and</strong> iii. oil <strong>and</strong> gas resource<br />

endowment. In the Reference Case the corresponding hypotheses are the following:<br />

- the world population increases to 8.7 billion persons in 2030, in line with most other longterm<br />

energy outlooks (Nakicenovic et al., 1998);<br />

- a rapid recovery <strong>of</strong> the world economy from the 1997-1998 crisis is assumed <strong>and</strong> World<br />

GDP is expected to rise at a sustained 3.3 % pa between 2000 <strong>and</strong> 2030; this corresponds to<br />

an increase <strong>of</strong> 2.1 % pa in average per capita GDP, with a lower increase in the OECD<br />

countries <strong>and</strong> some “catching-up” <strong>of</strong> the emerging regions <strong>of</strong> the world;<br />

- finally, oil <strong>and</strong> gas resource endowment is based on the USGS’ “mode” estimates (Masters et<br />

al., 1994), which amounts to 2 400 Gbl for oil Ultimate Recoverable Resources in 1990,<br />

while rising recovery rates in the model substantially increases future recoverable resources.<br />

Key features <strong>of</strong> the energy system in 2030<br />

These key hypotheses <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the Reference Case in terms <strong>of</strong> primary energy<br />

consumption <strong>and</strong> CO 2 emissions are summarised below in Table 7. According to this scenario<br />

<strong>and</strong> in spite <strong>of</strong> a marked trend to increased energy efficiency (+1.1 % pa until 2030), world<br />

energy consumption will increase by 2.2 % pa <strong>and</strong> almost double between now <strong>and</strong> 2030. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> the increase comes from developing regions as the growth in energy consumption is only <strong>of</strong><br />

0.8 % pa in the OECD region.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> primary source this case, which as already noted does not incorporate any CO 2<br />

constraint, implies significant increases in fossil fuel consumption. Coal consumption is strongly<br />

stimulated by rising energy dem<strong>and</strong> in China <strong>and</strong> India <strong>and</strong> experience the highest growth rate,<br />

followed by natural gas <strong>and</strong> then by oil. As for the non fossil fuel options, their share in world<br />

energy supply is decreasing as the growth <strong>of</strong> nuclear energy is very low <strong>and</strong> as renewables grow<br />

quickly but from very low initial levels.<br />

From these results, it thus appears that the secular trend <strong>of</strong> “decarbonisation” (Grübler <strong>and</strong><br />

Nakicenovic 1996) may experience some reversal in the next three decades. CO 2 emissions<br />

indeed increase more rapidly than total energy consumption: total CO 2 emissions rise to 8.2 GtC<br />

in 2010 <strong>and</strong> 13.4 GtC in 2030 from the 5.9 GtC level in 1990.<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!