sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Transport<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> technology data<br />
Detailed data on cost, performance <strong>and</strong> the anticipated life <strong>of</strong> existing technologies are not<br />
available. Overcoming this deficiency is a critical need. For new technologies, sharing <strong>of</strong><br />
information between countries on the above parameters is crucial.<br />
Inadequate <strong>economic</strong> data<br />
There is a need for credible data to analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> changes in energy prices on energy<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> in different sectors <strong>and</strong> their respective end uses. Such analysis would be useful in<br />
determining dem<strong>and</strong> elasticities, cross price elasticities, income elasticities <strong>and</strong> usage elasticities<br />
for various end uses. Moreover, it would be extremely valuable to assess the degree to which<br />
such elasticities are consistent or inconsistent in response to the introduction <strong>of</strong> new<br />
technologies.<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> a satisfactory integrated policy analysis<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> serious efforts, no fully satisfactory integrated analysis <strong>of</strong> alternative low-carbon<br />
futures is available because <strong>of</strong> the existing limitations in the framework for transportation<br />
analysis coupled with data problems. For instance, in the transport sector, just addressing<br />
efficiency improvement in technology is not sufficient for reduction <strong>of</strong> carbon emissions unless<br />
appropriate system <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> management measures to adopt such technologies through a<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> pricing <strong>and</strong> comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> control are in place.<br />
Barriers to market penetration <strong>of</strong> technologies<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> considerable work, experts have not achieved a consensus on the most effective ways<br />
<strong>of</strong> quantitatively describing the acceptance <strong>of</strong> new technology, either in terms <strong>of</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />
penetration or the fraction <strong>of</strong> the market at saturation.<br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> an appropriate institution<br />
There is a need to strengthen the existing institutions <strong>and</strong> to establish linkages for an effective<br />
real time communication through setting up <strong>of</strong> an apex body. The role <strong>of</strong> such an apex body<br />
would be to identify relevant institutions with a clear-cut action plan <strong>and</strong> review the existing<br />
plans <strong>and</strong> proposals. The apex body would also solicit feedback from the concerned<br />
agency/agencies on the problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> constraints on the existing institutional <strong>and</strong> regulatory<br />
mechanism. Also, wherever necessary, appropriate legislative changes, <strong>and</strong> their effective<br />
enforcement, are required.<br />
Investments in Research <strong>and</strong> Development<br />
If energy efficiency <strong>and</strong> low-carbon solutions in the transport sector are to be taken seriously<br />
from the viewpoint <strong>of</strong> climate change strategy, increased investments in energy R&D will be<br />
needed, along with supportive programs <strong>and</strong> policies. This would call for an aggressive national<br />
commitment to some combination <strong>of</strong> targeted tax incentives <strong>and</strong> non-price policies (e.g.,<br />
accelerated R&D, demonstration programs, <strong>and</strong> efficiency codes <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards).<br />
References<br />
ADB/GEF/UNDP, 1998. Asia least-cost greenhouse gas abatement strategy (ALGAS) – India,<br />
Bangladesh, Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea. Asian Development Bank/Global<br />
Environment Facility/United Nations Development Program. Manila, October.<br />
Bose, R.K., 1998. Automotive energy use <strong>and</strong> emissions control: a simulation model to analyze<br />
transport strategies for Indian metropolises. Energy Policy, 26 (13): 1001-1016.<br />
Dargay J <strong>and</strong> Gately, D., 1999. Income’s effect on car <strong>and</strong> vehicle ownership, worldwide: 1960-<br />
2015. Transportation Research Part A (33):101-138.<br />
180