sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ranjan K. Bose<br />
Theoretically, an emission tax has been suggested by the experts to be the most effective means<br />
to reduce pollution, because it would provide consumers with incentives to choose the least-cost<br />
options across these two approaches. But, in practice such a tax would be weighed down by need<br />
for effective emission monitoring, which is difficult. A more practical strategy would be to<br />
reduce both emissions <strong>and</strong> congestion, using a mixed set <strong>of</strong> instruments, which are dictated by<br />
either comm<strong>and</strong> or control, <strong>and</strong>/or the market based principles (Table 1). The instruments are<br />
taxes on fuels, vehicles, <strong>and</strong> parking; incentives <strong>and</strong> regulations affecting vehicles with a view to<br />
reduce the rate <strong>of</strong> growth in ownership <strong>of</strong> personal vehicles; <strong>and</strong> traffic management <strong>and</strong> the<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> public transport alternatives.<br />
Reduce mass emissions<br />
The following measures are required to reduce emissions per vehicle kilometre travelled: (1)<br />
enforcing higher maintenance st<strong>and</strong>ards on existing vehicles, in order to keep emissions closer to<br />
the design st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> the vehicles; (2) introducing vehicles designed to meet new emission<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards; (3) introducing unleaded fuels (with or without catalytic converters) for the rapid<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> atmospheric lead, <strong>and</strong> (4) retr<strong>of</strong>itting motor vehicles to use other kinds <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />
modifications or fuels, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or<br />
propane.<br />
Reduce total vehicle kilometres travelled<br />
This can be accomplished by either reducing the total dem<strong>and</strong> for travel or altering the mix <strong>of</strong><br />
vehicles used to carry travellers. The first option may be achieved in part by increasing the cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> travel. More important is improved spatial planning to reduce the total dem<strong>and</strong> for travel.<br />
Table 1<br />
Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> policy instruments to control motor vehicle emissions<br />
Market based<br />
Comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> control regulations<br />
Direct Indirect Direct Indirect<br />
Vehicle<br />
Emission fees Differential vehicle<br />
taxation; tax allowance for<br />
new vehicles; promote<br />
retr<strong>of</strong>it with alternative<br />
fuels<br />
Fuel<br />
- Differential fuel taxation<br />
with dirtier fuel to be<br />
taxed higher; high fuel<br />
taxes; remove subsidies<br />
from kerosene<br />
Emission<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />
Phasing out <strong>of</strong><br />
high polluting<br />
fuels; fuel<br />
composition<br />
Periodic inspection<br />
<strong>and</strong> maintenance<br />
programme; use <strong>of</strong><br />
low polluting vehicles;<br />
scrapping <strong>of</strong> polluting<br />
vehicles<br />
Fuel economy<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards; speed limits<br />
Traffic<br />
- Congestion <strong>and</strong> parking<br />
charges; subsidies for lesspolluting<br />
modes<br />
Physical restraint<br />
<strong>of</strong> traffic;<br />
designated routes<br />
Restraints on vehicle<br />
use; bus lanes <strong>and</strong><br />
other priorities<br />
169