03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ranjan K. Bose<br />

Theoretically, an emission tax has been suggested by the experts to be the most effective means<br />

to reduce pollution, because it would provide consumers with incentives to choose the least-cost<br />

options across these two approaches. But, in practice such a tax would be weighed down by need<br />

for effective emission monitoring, which is difficult. A more practical strategy would be to<br />

reduce both emissions <strong>and</strong> congestion, using a mixed set <strong>of</strong> instruments, which are dictated by<br />

either comm<strong>and</strong> or control, <strong>and</strong>/or the market based principles (Table 1). The instruments are<br />

taxes on fuels, vehicles, <strong>and</strong> parking; incentives <strong>and</strong> regulations affecting vehicles with a view to<br />

reduce the rate <strong>of</strong> growth in ownership <strong>of</strong> personal vehicles; <strong>and</strong> traffic management <strong>and</strong> the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> public transport alternatives.<br />

Reduce mass emissions<br />

The following measures are required to reduce emissions per vehicle kilometre travelled: (1)<br />

enforcing higher maintenance st<strong>and</strong>ards on existing vehicles, in order to keep emissions closer to<br />

the design st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> the vehicles; (2) introducing vehicles designed to meet new emission<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards; (3) introducing unleaded fuels (with or without catalytic converters) for the rapid<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> atmospheric lead, <strong>and</strong> (4) retr<strong>of</strong>itting motor vehicles to use other kinds <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />

modifications or fuels, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or<br />

propane.<br />

Reduce total vehicle kilometres travelled<br />

This can be accomplished by either reducing the total dem<strong>and</strong> for travel or altering the mix <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles used to carry travellers. The first option may be achieved in part by increasing the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> travel. More important is improved spatial planning to reduce the total dem<strong>and</strong> for travel.<br />

Table 1<br />

Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> policy instruments to control motor vehicle emissions<br />

Market based<br />

Comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> control regulations<br />

Direct Indirect Direct Indirect<br />

Vehicle<br />

Emission fees Differential vehicle<br />

taxation; tax allowance for<br />

new vehicles; promote<br />

retr<strong>of</strong>it with alternative<br />

fuels<br />

Fuel<br />

- Differential fuel taxation<br />

with dirtier fuel to be<br />

taxed higher; high fuel<br />

taxes; remove subsidies<br />

from kerosene<br />

Emission<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Phasing out <strong>of</strong><br />

high polluting<br />

fuels; fuel<br />

composition<br />

Periodic inspection<br />

<strong>and</strong> maintenance<br />

programme; use <strong>of</strong><br />

low polluting vehicles;<br />

scrapping <strong>of</strong> polluting<br />

vehicles<br />

Fuel economy<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards; speed limits<br />

Traffic<br />

- Congestion <strong>and</strong> parking<br />

charges; subsidies for lesspolluting<br />

modes<br />

Physical restraint<br />

<strong>of</strong> traffic;<br />

designated routes<br />

Restraints on vehicle<br />

use; bus lanes <strong>and</strong><br />

other priorities<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!