sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ranjan K. Bose<br />
vehicle fleet is estimated for China in the decade 1990 to 2000. Similarly, in India, over two-fold<br />
increase in vehicle fleet is estimated during the same period – from 21 million to 43 million<br />
(Faiz, et al., 1990). In contrast, much <strong>of</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong> for motor vehicles in the developed<br />
countries will be for vehicle replacement; <strong>and</strong> (4) Globally, transport-related CO 2 emissions<br />
could rise between 40% <strong>and</strong> 100% by 2025 (Moreno <strong>and</strong> Skea, 1996).<br />
The growth <strong>of</strong> road-based transportation system is the central problem, especially in urban areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> developing economies. In the developing economies, these systems compared to those in the<br />
developed ones are characterized by the following factors: (1) Much lower levels <strong>of</strong><br />
motorization, 1 (2) more rapid rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>economic</strong> growth, population growth, <strong>and</strong> the growth in<br />
number <strong>of</strong> motor vehicles, (3) higher population densities, (4) much lower per capita energy<br />
consumption <strong>and</strong> emissions <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide, <strong>and</strong> (5) reduced access to capital <strong>and</strong> to advanced<br />
environmental technologies. Despite the far greater level <strong>of</strong> vehicle ownership, higher rate <strong>of</strong> trip<br />
generation <strong>and</strong> increased use <strong>of</strong> energy on a per capita basis in cities <strong>of</strong> the developed countries,<br />
it is the cities in the developing countries that, in general, suffer most from growing<br />
environmental degradation. In cities <strong>of</strong> developing economies, there has been a rapid explosion<br />
<strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>and</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> private vehicles (scooters, motorbikes, autorickshaws <strong>and</strong> cars).<br />
Growing motorization coupled with limited road space, absence <strong>of</strong> an appropriate road traffic<br />
reduction strategy on major corridors, an ageing <strong>and</strong> ill-maintained vehicle stock, a sizeable share<br />
<strong>of</strong> two-stroke engine technologies, absence <strong>of</strong> an efficient public transport system, poor<br />
conditions for pedestrians <strong>and</strong> cyclists, inadequate separation between working <strong>and</strong> living space<br />
<strong>and</strong> moving space, <strong>and</strong> lower fuel quality, have all led to traffic congestion resulting in longer<br />
travel time, discomfort to road users, extra fuel consumption, high level pollution <strong>and</strong> GHG<br />
emissions. Further, due to the adverse effects on health largely resulting from pollutant emissions<br />
due to transportation activity, reduction <strong>of</strong> air pollution is an emerging priority in cities <strong>of</strong><br />
developing countries over global climate change. In view <strong>of</strong> this, the basic question is to what<br />
extent there is a synergy in the solutions to urban air pollution <strong>and</strong> global warming problems.<br />
The paper makes an attempt to answer how air pollution control programmes – as experienced in<br />
the cities <strong>of</strong> developing countries – could be modified by taking into consideration global climate<br />
change concerns. More specifically, the paper addresses the following questions in relation to the<br />
carbon <strong>mitigation</strong> options in the transport sector in developing nations:<br />
• How should a synergy be arrived at between global <strong>and</strong> local environmental agenda?<br />
• What is the kind <strong>of</strong> policy framework that needs to be adopted to conserve energy-use <strong>and</strong><br />
reduce emissions <strong>of</strong> local air pollutants <strong>and</strong> CO 2 ?<br />
• What ranges <strong>of</strong> energy-efficient <strong>and</strong> low-carbon energy supply options should be considered<br />
for mitigating emissions?<br />
• What are the likely associated <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> in the next 15–20 years?<br />
• What policy instruments are necessary for implementation <strong>of</strong> energy-efficient <strong>and</strong><br />
environment-friendly projects?<br />
The next section provides a broad overview <strong>of</strong> the historic <strong>and</strong> future trends <strong>of</strong> transport energy<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> related CO 2 emissions, <strong>and</strong> regional differences in level <strong>of</strong> motorization in the<br />
OECD <strong>and</strong> non-OECD regions. Then a generic policy framework is presented that needs to be<br />
adopted in any country to simultaneously reduce urban air pollution problems <strong>and</strong> global<br />
warming problems. A review <strong>of</strong> the technological potential to cost-effectively increase energy<br />
efficiency in transport <strong>and</strong> thereby reduce GHG emissions in developing <strong>and</strong> industrialized<br />
countries <strong>of</strong> Asia is provided. The locally motivated vehicular emission control programmes for<br />
Mexico City, Santiago <strong>and</strong> Delhi have been reviewed while explaining how the goals pursued<br />
differ from those relating to the global climate change agenda. A synergy in solutions between<br />
1 The level <strong>of</strong> motorization is measured as the growth in ownership <strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> motorized vehicles.<br />
165