03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fossil Fuels<br />

Climate Policy <strong>and</strong> Job Impacts: Recent Assessments <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Case <strong>of</strong> Coal 1<br />

Seth Dunn <strong>and</strong> Michael Renner<br />

1 Introduction<br />

Several recent climate policy assessments conducted in the United States <strong>and</strong> Europe suggest that<br />

net employment increases can be achieved through full-cost energy pricing, an accelerated<br />

uptake <strong>of</strong> energy-efficient <strong>and</strong> renewable technologies, <strong>and</strong> greater use <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />

transportation modes. While some <strong>of</strong> these jobs arise from re-spending efficiency savings on<br />

more labor-intensive services in non-energy sectors, renewable energy has considerable direct<br />

job-creating potential, some <strong>of</strong> which is beginning to be realized in parts <strong>of</strong> Europe <strong>and</strong> the<br />

United States. The possible <strong>benefits</strong> for developing countries are especially significant, both for<br />

avoiding burdensome financial expenses on fossil fuel imports <strong>and</strong> for creating new sources <strong>of</strong><br />

employment.<br />

Even in the absence <strong>of</strong> climate policies, employment in fossil fuel energy industries is declining<br />

<strong>and</strong> will continue to do so due to consolidation <strong>and</strong> other cost-cutting practices: coal miners, for<br />

example, account for less than one-third <strong>of</strong> 1 percent <strong>of</strong> the global workforce. A major challenge<br />

facing governments seeking to ease this transition will be to facilitate the location <strong>of</strong> “sunrise”<br />

industries—such as natural gas, wind turbines, <strong>and</strong> solar photovoltaics—in communities affected<br />

by the decline <strong>of</strong> “sunset” industries like coal <strong>and</strong> oil. In addition, the use <strong>of</strong> energy <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

carbon tax revenues to reduce payroll taxes <strong>and</strong> the targeted redirection <strong>of</strong> fossil fuel subsidies<br />

toward job retraining programs <strong>and</strong> retirement packages could lessen the resistance <strong>of</strong> workers in<br />

these industries to proactive climate policies.<br />

2 The Changing Environment <strong>of</strong> Work<br />

As has been the case with past environmental policies, the potential employment impact <strong>of</strong><br />

climate change <strong>mitigation</strong> has been subject to considerable debate. Even with growing public<br />

concern over climate change, this debate risks polarization as the rise <strong>of</strong> the information<br />

economy <strong>and</strong> trends toward <strong>economic</strong> globalization spawn concerns about job security, skills<br />

obsolescence, <strong>and</strong> wage trends. In Europe, for example, more than 10 percent <strong>of</strong> all jobs vanish<br />

each year, replaced by different jobs; in Germany in 1995, 30 percent <strong>of</strong> employees were in<br />

“insecure” jobs. Unemployment rates have been rising in advanced industrial nations since 1970,<br />

have risen rapidly in the Former Eastern Bloc nations since the end <strong>of</strong> the Cold War, <strong>and</strong> are<br />

becoming problematic in many regions <strong>of</strong> the developing world. (See Table 1.)<br />

Traditionally, industrial nations have sought to economize on labor in an environment <strong>of</strong><br />

resource abundance. The current situation <strong>of</strong> growing labor abundance <strong>and</strong> carbon constraint,<br />

however, argues for economizing on energy through improved productivity. There is substantial<br />

scope for enhancing energy productivity, which in the U.S. in the mid-1990s was only marginally<br />

higher than in 1950. (See Figure 1.)<br />

1<br />

This paper is adapted from S. Dunn, “King Coal’s Weakening Grip on Power,” <strong>and</strong> M. Renner,<br />

“Creating Jobs, Preserving the Environment.” See references for further detail.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!