03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fossil Fuels<br />

Table 2<br />

Emission Abatement Studies<br />

Changes in CO 2 Emissions <strong>and</strong> Gas Dem<strong>and</strong> from Reference Case in Alternative<br />

Change in<br />

CO2<br />

Emissions<br />

Change in<br />

Natural Gas<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

Ratio <strong>of</strong> Changes<br />

in Gas Dem<strong>and</strong><br />

to those <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />

Emissions Year Region<br />

(%) (%)<br />

DRI (1992) -11.7 -7.2 0.62 2005 EC<br />

Hoeller et al (1991) -49.2 -27.4 0.56 2000 World<br />

Bossier <strong>and</strong> De Rous (1992) -8.2 3.0 -0.37 1999 Belgium<br />

Proost <strong>and</strong> Van Regemorter (1992) -28.0 15.3 -0.55 2005 Belgium<br />

Burniaux et al (1991) -53.6 0.0 0.0 2020 World<br />

Barker (1995) -12.8 -6.2 0.48 2005 UK<br />

IEA (1993) -8.8 23.0 -2.61 2010 OECD<br />

Ghanem et al (1999) -9.0 -8.2 0.91 2010 World<br />

Baron (1996) (1) -8.5 (2) -4.0 0.47 2000 USA<br />

Birkelund et al (1994) -10.7 -8.0 0.75 2010 EU<br />

Bernow et al (1997) -17.8 -5.4 0.30 2015 Minnesota<br />

Gregory et al (1992) -8.4 -5.2 0.62 2005 UK<br />

WEC (1993) Case C -24.3 -16.5 0.68 2020 World<br />

Kratena <strong>and</strong> Schleicher (1998) -29.0 -36.4 1.26 2005 Austria<br />

Mitsubishi Research Institute (1998) -11.3 (3) 9.2 -0.81 2010 OECD<br />

Fujime (1998) -16.3 (3) -6.2 0.38 2010 Japan<br />

Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -30.0 -25.0 0.83 2010 USA<br />

Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -24.0 -49.0 2.04 2010 Japan<br />

Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -18.0 -38.0 2.11 2010 EU<br />

Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -25.0 -41.0 1.64 2010 Other OECD<br />

Bacchilega et al (1999) -2.3 -1.2 0.52 2010 Italy<br />

(1) Citing a study by the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO).<br />

(2) Estimated.<br />

(3) Change in fossil fuel dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Median ratio (column 3): 0.56<br />

Reviewing the published studies as shown in Table 2, the percentage fall in CO 2 emissions <strong>and</strong> in<br />

gas dem<strong>and</strong>, we note that median impact estimate suggests that gas dem<strong>and</strong>, compared to<br />

reference case, will fall by about half <strong>of</strong> that in carbon emissions. Therefore gas dem<strong>and</strong> may,<br />

indeed, be lower as a result <strong>of</strong> the Kyoto policies compared to what they would have been. Given<br />

that many oil exporting countries are also gas exporters, such countries could arguably suffer a<br />

double loss in export revenue. It is important, therefore, to include falling gas revenues in the<br />

total impact assessment.<br />

Impact Minimisation<br />

Finally, the last part <strong>of</strong> the paper examines how these impacts could be minimised. Needless to<br />

say that OECD energy taxation, especially in EU countries, on oil products is very high <strong>and</strong> has a<br />

strong emphasis upon oil. For example, average tax on the composite barrel in the EU was $65/b<br />

in 1998, or 68% <strong>of</strong> retail price, while taxes on coal <strong>and</strong> natural gas are either nil or negligible.<br />

Calls for "greening" <strong>of</strong> taxes have been heard even among OECD policy-makers (e.g. Norwegian<br />

Energy Minister). Research has also indicated energy efficiency gains for the economy as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> restructuring energy taxes according to their carbon content. Therefore, it is better to examine<br />

a scenario based on restructuring energy taxes according to their carbon content. This is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the most effective ways to minimise the negative impacts on the economy <strong>of</strong> developing<br />

countries <strong>and</strong>, at the same time, an effective way to reduce CO 2 emissions by a significant<br />

degree. It is interesting to note that OECD CO 2 emissions will be reduced by at least 10% by<br />

2010, once the energy taxes are restructured according to their carbon content. This is significant<br />

CO 2 emissions reduction which fulfils almost half <strong>of</strong> the Kyoto target.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!