sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fossil Fuels<br />
Table 2<br />
Emission Abatement Studies<br />
Changes in CO 2 Emissions <strong>and</strong> Gas Dem<strong>and</strong> from Reference Case in Alternative<br />
Change in<br />
CO2<br />
Emissions<br />
Change in<br />
Natural Gas<br />
Dem<strong>and</strong><br />
Ratio <strong>of</strong> Changes<br />
in Gas Dem<strong>and</strong><br />
to those <strong>of</strong> CO 2<br />
Emissions Year Region<br />
(%) (%)<br />
DRI (1992) -11.7 -7.2 0.62 2005 EC<br />
Hoeller et al (1991) -49.2 -27.4 0.56 2000 World<br />
Bossier <strong>and</strong> De Rous (1992) -8.2 3.0 -0.37 1999 Belgium<br />
Proost <strong>and</strong> Van Regemorter (1992) -28.0 15.3 -0.55 2005 Belgium<br />
Burniaux et al (1991) -53.6 0.0 0.0 2020 World<br />
Barker (1995) -12.8 -6.2 0.48 2005 UK<br />
IEA (1993) -8.8 23.0 -2.61 2010 OECD<br />
Ghanem et al (1999) -9.0 -8.2 0.91 2010 World<br />
Baron (1996) (1) -8.5 (2) -4.0 0.47 2000 USA<br />
Birkelund et al (1994) -10.7 -8.0 0.75 2010 EU<br />
Bernow et al (1997) -17.8 -5.4 0.30 2015 Minnesota<br />
Gregory et al (1992) -8.4 -5.2 0.62 2005 UK<br />
WEC (1993) Case C -24.3 -16.5 0.68 2020 World<br />
Kratena <strong>and</strong> Schleicher (1998) -29.0 -36.4 1.26 2005 Austria<br />
Mitsubishi Research Institute (1998) -11.3 (3) 9.2 -0.81 2010 OECD<br />
Fujime (1998) -16.3 (3) -6.2 0.38 2010 Japan<br />
Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -30.0 -25.0 0.83 2010 USA<br />
Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -24.0 -49.0 2.04 2010 Japan<br />
Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -18.0 -38.0 2.11 2010 EU<br />
Bernstein, Montgomery, Rutherford (1999) -25.0 -41.0 1.64 2010 Other OECD<br />
Bacchilega et al (1999) -2.3 -1.2 0.52 2010 Italy<br />
(1) Citing a study by the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO).<br />
(2) Estimated.<br />
(3) Change in fossil fuel dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Median ratio (column 3): 0.56<br />
Reviewing the published studies as shown in Table 2, the percentage fall in CO 2 emissions <strong>and</strong> in<br />
gas dem<strong>and</strong>, we note that median impact estimate suggests that gas dem<strong>and</strong>, compared to<br />
reference case, will fall by about half <strong>of</strong> that in carbon emissions. Therefore gas dem<strong>and</strong> may,<br />
indeed, be lower as a result <strong>of</strong> the Kyoto policies compared to what they would have been. Given<br />
that many oil exporting countries are also gas exporters, such countries could arguably suffer a<br />
double loss in export revenue. It is important, therefore, to include falling gas revenues in the<br />
total impact assessment.<br />
Impact Minimisation<br />
Finally, the last part <strong>of</strong> the paper examines how these impacts could be minimised. Needless to<br />
say that OECD energy taxation, especially in EU countries, on oil products is very high <strong>and</strong> has a<br />
strong emphasis upon oil. For example, average tax on the composite barrel in the EU was $65/b<br />
in 1998, or 68% <strong>of</strong> retail price, while taxes on coal <strong>and</strong> natural gas are either nil or negligible.<br />
Calls for "greening" <strong>of</strong> taxes have been heard even among OECD policy-makers (e.g. Norwegian<br />
Energy Minister). Research has also indicated energy efficiency gains for the economy as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> restructuring energy taxes according to their carbon content. Therefore, it is better to examine<br />
a scenario based on restructuring energy taxes according to their carbon content. This is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the most effective ways to minimise the negative impacts on the economy <strong>of</strong> developing<br />
countries <strong>and</strong>, at the same time, an effective way to reduce CO 2 emissions by a significant<br />
degree. It is interesting to note that OECD CO 2 emissions will be reduced by at least 10% by<br />
2010, once the energy taxes are restructured according to their carbon content. This is significant<br />
CO 2 emissions reduction which fulfils almost half <strong>of</strong> the Kyoto target.<br />
66