03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ranjan K. Bose<br />

fuel switching in private cars as well as in the public transportation systems such as railways<br />

(replacement <strong>of</strong> coal-fired steam locomotives with higher-efficiency diesel <strong>and</strong>/or electric<br />

powered locomotives).<br />

Among the alternative transportation fuels considered in the cities <strong>of</strong> Asian countries,<br />

compressed natural gas (CNG) in new vehicles appears to have the greatest potential to reduce<br />

GHG emissions in India, whereas liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) vehicles are more promising for<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea. Corrective measures to form a market are needed for the spread <strong>of</strong> such newfuel<br />

automobiles. To facilitate the distribution <strong>of</strong> low pollution automobiles <strong>and</strong> achieve the goal<br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing exhaust gas emissions, technical <strong>and</strong> institutional support as well as adequate<br />

infrastructure is needed. The India study suggests modification in building bylaws by a special<br />

committee for the introduction <strong>of</strong> CNG stations <strong>and</strong> increasing its level <strong>of</strong> penetration. Similarly,<br />

the Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea study suggests construction <strong>of</strong> recharging stations <strong>and</strong> revision in the<br />

existing laws on fire safety, the gas safety <strong>and</strong> the auto management. The high cost <strong>of</strong> these new<br />

vehicles is another obstacle to increasing the customer base.<br />

More radical technological changes involve the introduction <strong>of</strong> new vehicle propulsion systems<br />

such as the replacement <strong>of</strong> internal combustion engines with electric motors or fuel cells <strong>and</strong> the<br />

accompanying changes in vehicle design. More revolutionary technological change would be<br />

represented by massive introduction <strong>of</strong> a new generation <strong>of</strong> electric vehicles, due to the high enduse<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> electric cars. Another alternative is hydrogen fuel cell powered vehicles. It is<br />

therefore important to carry out demonstration <strong>of</strong> fuel cell buses for the cities in developing<br />

countries to study the environmental implications. These two technological options <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> drastically reducing carbon emissions or even achieving zero-carbon emissions, but<br />

the carbon reduction <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> such options would be very high.<br />

Technological <strong>and</strong> <strong>economic</strong> potential<br />

The section provides a review <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> four-country studies in Asia (namely, India,<br />

Bangladesh, Thail<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Republic <strong>of</strong> Korea) to analyze primarily the potential <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

technologies to reduce CO 2 emissions in the transport sector. These studies were conducted<br />

under the Asia Least-cost Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy (ALGAS) project executed by the<br />

Asian Development Bank from 1995 to 1998 (ADB/GEF/UNDP, 1998).<br />

Cumulative carbon reduction<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the four country studies in Asia has used dynamic linear optimization models that<br />

provide the long-term opportunities for GHGs <strong>mitigation</strong> <strong>and</strong> are feasible for implementation till<br />

2020 at the national level. For each scenario, the model chooses the least-cost option, taking<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the efficiency <strong>and</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> the different options available to meet an end-use in<br />

different sectors <strong>of</strong> an economy. The underlying macro<strong>economic</strong> factors remain unchanged<br />

across all scenarios. The most likely scenario has been identified as the BL (Baseline) scenario<br />

against which all references are made. In each study, the <strong>mitigation</strong> options in the energy sector<br />

are classified into the following three categories: improvement in energy efficiency through<br />

upgrading the currently employed technologies plus planned/committed technologies in near<br />

future, fuel substitution, <strong>and</strong> the introduction <strong>of</strong> advanced technologies along with use <strong>of</strong> new<br />

<strong>and</strong> renewable energy.<br />

The optimized model results were finally used to develop the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> emissions reduction<br />

initiative (CERI) curves for different scenarios, with different real discount rates for each<br />

country. Table 2 summarizes average carbon abatement <strong>costs</strong> using CERI curves for India,<br />

Bangladesh <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!