03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Renewable Energy<br />

- the socio-institutional context <strong>and</strong> structural factors, which are <strong>of</strong>ten analysed as being<br />

incorporated in National Systems <strong>of</strong> Innovation with strong characteristic features (Lundvall).<br />

The direction <strong>of</strong> TC: inducement factors to deterministic <strong>and</strong> reversible changes<br />

While in the two previous approaches the direction <strong>of</strong> TC is either purely exogenous or<br />

endogenous to the process <strong>of</strong> innovation, the inducement theory tries to assess the role <strong>of</strong> factors<br />

which are both exogenous to the technological system considered <strong>and</strong> endogenous to the<br />

<strong>economic</strong> system as a whole. Particularly, the “Dem<strong>and</strong>-Pull” vs. “Supply-Push” controversy has<br />

been dealing with the identification <strong>of</strong> the factors explaining the direction <strong>of</strong> TC. On one h<strong>and</strong><br />

Schmookler (1966) emphasised the role <strong>of</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> (market size <strong>and</strong> growth) as the key<br />

inducement factor for innovation. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, “Supply-Push” theories advocate the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> either the relative abundance or scarcity <strong>of</strong> the relevant factors <strong>of</strong> production, or <strong>of</strong><br />

the available sets <strong>of</strong> technological opportunities in the dominant direction <strong>of</strong> technological<br />

progress.<br />

In the “Supply-Push” perspective, public policies - be they R&D expenditures, or “market<br />

access”, or any type <strong>of</strong> regulatory policy - may have decisive impacts on TC. Very few attempts<br />

have been performed in order to analyse, in a theoretical perspective, the design, implementation<br />

<strong>and</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> TC inducement measures in a public policy perspective.<br />

It thus appears from this review <strong>of</strong> the literature that most <strong>of</strong> the concepts <strong>and</strong> mechanisms<br />

analysed in the existing literature on technical change have their relevance <strong>and</strong> that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

on-going controversies seem to derive from the relative importance attributed to different<br />

phenomenon by different authors. In the same way that the circular scheme proposed by<br />

Rosenberg allows to supersede the “Dem<strong>and</strong>-Pull” vs. “Supply-Push” controversy, some<br />

progress could probably derive from Ruttan’s proposal to combine the “induced TC” perspective<br />

with the “path-dependency” perspective, while also taking into account the public policy issue<br />

(Ruttan, 1996).<br />

“There remains however the need for a more complete integration <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> induced<br />

innovation <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> path-dependent technical change with the theory <strong>of</strong> incentive<br />

compatible institutional design. […] The incentive compatibility problem has yet not been solved<br />

even at the most abstract theoretical level. It represents however, a missing link in the effort to<br />

harness induced technical change <strong>and</strong> path-dependent technical change theories to confront the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> environmental change.”<br />

The two following sub-sections successively address, in a more empirical perspective, the key<br />

inducement factors <strong>and</strong> path-dependent features <strong>of</strong> TC for energy technologies.<br />

2.2. Inducement factors: a brief review <strong>of</strong> past energy R&D policies <strong>of</strong> major industrialised<br />

countries<br />

R&D expenditure stimulates technology improvement <strong>and</strong> today’s technology dynamics depend,<br />

to a large extent, on accumulated scientific <strong>and</strong> technological knowledge. In the energy sector,<br />

public R&D budgets increased considerably in the early seventies, as an answer to the challenges<br />

posed by the oil shocks. Although the results <strong>of</strong> these large public energy R&D (PERD)<br />

programs have been mixed, it is important, in order to underst<strong>and</strong> current <strong>and</strong> future energy<br />

technology dynamics, to characterise the effort <strong>and</strong> the stock <strong>of</strong> knowledge accumulated during<br />

the past twenty five years.<br />

This sub-section aims at giving a consistent description <strong>of</strong> past PERD spending in the G7<br />

countries. Budgets are first analysed on a year by year basis in order to identify trends <strong>and</strong><br />

structural changes. Cumulative public research is then examined for a set <strong>of</strong> key technologies,<br />

<strong>and</strong> is considered as a “proxy” for accumulated knowledge for each group <strong>of</strong> technologies.<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!