sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Seth Dunn<br />
Discussion: Climate Change Mitigation in the Transport<br />
Sector - Moving Towards Low-Cost Solutions<br />
Seth Dunn<br />
1 Introduction<br />
The debate over <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gas <strong>mitigation</strong> is <strong>of</strong> critical importance with<br />
respect to the transport sector—the fastest-growing source <strong>of</strong> emissions. Within the transport<br />
sector, the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> addressing private automobile use are vigorously debated.<br />
Though much emissions reduction potential lies in the automotive sector, the industry has<br />
historically resisted safety <strong>and</strong> environmental regulations despite the consistent, if limited, track<br />
record <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards in making cars safer, cleaner, <strong>and</strong> more efficient.<br />
Models that suggest that the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> transport GHG <strong>mitigation</strong> will be high generally have two<br />
major deficiencies, one <strong>of</strong> technology <strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong> policy. First, they assume a limited availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> alternative fuels, such as natural gas <strong>and</strong> hydrogen, even in the medium- to long-term - despite<br />
growing momentum to bring fuel-cell cars to market by 2004. Secondly, they assume that the<br />
main policy instrument will be a dramatic increase in fuel prices - an approach that is neither<br />
politically realistic nor necessary.<br />
This paper discusses a nascent “technology pull” underway in automotive innovation, <strong>and</strong><br />
catalyzed by a “policy push” which, if strengthened, could greatly lower the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />
substitution. It reaffirms Dr. Bose’s suggestion that “local-global” synergies be tapped, <strong>and</strong><br />
dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply measures balanced, in crafting transport strategies, <strong>and</strong> suggests the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> fuel economy st<strong>and</strong>ards, clean car m<strong>and</strong>ates, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use policies into these<br />
strategies. Finally, it outlines the results <strong>of</strong> a modeling effort by Tellus Institute that shows<br />
significant energy <strong>and</strong> carbon savings <strong>and</strong> net employment increases through implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
a diverse policy package over the next decade.<br />
2 Automotive Innovation: The Argument for a Policy Push<br />
As world automobile production continues to rise <strong>and</strong> the overall fleet size exp<strong>and</strong>s, the need to<br />
encourage innovation in this sector becomes increasingly critical from a GHG <strong>mitigation</strong><br />
perspective. Annual passenger car production has increased nearly five-fold since 1950. This has<br />
pushed the global car fleet to more than 508 million in 1998 (See Figure 1). The rate <strong>of</strong> car<br />
population growth has generally exceeded that <strong>of</strong> the human population over the last halfcentury,<br />
leading to a decline in the number <strong>of</strong> people per cars from 48 in 1950 to less than 12 in<br />
1998.<br />
As the global trend in car use continues upward, evidence is accumulating that public policies<br />
can induce <strong>and</strong> enhance technological innovation in the automotive sector. In its 1996 report<br />
Green Auto Racing, the Natural Resources Defense Council surveyed 13 national governments<br />
<strong>and</strong> 7 international bodies to find <strong>and</strong> assess their policies to promote advanced fuels <strong>and</strong><br />
vehicles in the automotive sector (See Table 1). Based on the survey responses <strong>and</strong> a literature<br />
search, the authors found that policies <strong>and</strong> programs fell into five overlapping areas (See Table<br />
2).<br />
183