03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Seth Dunn<br />

Discussion: Climate Change Mitigation in the Transport<br />

Sector - Moving Towards Low-Cost Solutions<br />

Seth Dunn<br />

1 Introduction<br />

The debate over <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gas <strong>mitigation</strong> is <strong>of</strong> critical importance with<br />

respect to the transport sector—the fastest-growing source <strong>of</strong> emissions. Within the transport<br />

sector, the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> addressing private automobile use are vigorously debated.<br />

Though much emissions reduction potential lies in the automotive sector, the industry has<br />

historically resisted safety <strong>and</strong> environmental regulations despite the consistent, if limited, track<br />

record <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards in making cars safer, cleaner, <strong>and</strong> more efficient.<br />

Models that suggest that the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> transport GHG <strong>mitigation</strong> will be high generally have two<br />

major deficiencies, one <strong>of</strong> technology <strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong> policy. First, they assume a limited availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> alternative fuels, such as natural gas <strong>and</strong> hydrogen, even in the medium- to long-term - despite<br />

growing momentum to bring fuel-cell cars to market by 2004. Secondly, they assume that the<br />

main policy instrument will be a dramatic increase in fuel prices - an approach that is neither<br />

politically realistic nor necessary.<br />

This paper discusses a nascent “technology pull” underway in automotive innovation, <strong>and</strong><br />

catalyzed by a “policy push” which, if strengthened, could greatly lower the <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />

substitution. It reaffirms Dr. Bose’s suggestion that “local-global” synergies be tapped, <strong>and</strong><br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply measures balanced, in crafting transport strategies, <strong>and</strong> suggests the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> fuel economy st<strong>and</strong>ards, clean car m<strong>and</strong>ates, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> use policies into these<br />

strategies. Finally, it outlines the results <strong>of</strong> a modeling effort by Tellus Institute that shows<br />

significant energy <strong>and</strong> carbon savings <strong>and</strong> net employment increases through implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

a diverse policy package over the next decade.<br />

2 Automotive Innovation: The Argument for a Policy Push<br />

As world automobile production continues to rise <strong>and</strong> the overall fleet size exp<strong>and</strong>s, the need to<br />

encourage innovation in this sector becomes increasingly critical from a GHG <strong>mitigation</strong><br />

perspective. Annual passenger car production has increased nearly five-fold since 1950. This has<br />

pushed the global car fleet to more than 508 million in 1998 (See Figure 1). The rate <strong>of</strong> car<br />

population growth has generally exceeded that <strong>of</strong> the human population over the last halfcentury,<br />

leading to a decline in the number <strong>of</strong> people per cars from 48 in 1950 to less than 12 in<br />

1998.<br />

As the global trend in car use continues upward, evidence is accumulating that public policies<br />

can induce <strong>and</strong> enhance technological innovation in the automotive sector. In its 1996 report<br />

Green Auto Racing, the Natural Resources Defense Council surveyed 13 national governments<br />

<strong>and</strong> 7 international bodies to find <strong>and</strong> assess their policies to promote advanced fuels <strong>and</strong><br />

vehicles in the automotive sector (See Table 1). Based on the survey responses <strong>and</strong> a literature<br />

search, the authors found that policies <strong>and</strong> programs fell into five overlapping areas (See Table<br />

2).<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!